Re: RFC: Dovecot locking

diff --git a/f6/1f23ae659bb7c7aebaee64d0ed747bf0da365e b/f6/1f23ae659bb7c7aebaee64d0ed747bf0da365e
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..82615f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f6/1f23ae659bb7c7aebaee64d0ed747bf0da365e
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802A2431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 1.463\r
+X-Spam-Level: *\r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id XfsaH1kDibGB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:43 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
+       [88.164.105.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDA2431FB5\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:41:43 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC951E07A;\r
+       Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:41:41 +0100 (CET)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
+       :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=6SdZ+252gZ8KxUhCzAn5Xl\r
+       7PBcU=; b=FOo8N3Zd9ZgARwKpMBYemKNbHv3mxVQ6KSjV4MaQZ8oEuLEWupgZqN\r
+       Ub4LlANtr+4XlR9Vv9ApVTwrG2OUD41upCBPhEPOt3696R47jR891A5egFPSSwbc\r
+       ZGNkuaO35mbc7Bbox2+qtHpUHS0to86W/tRgb9/lHMPOTHnaJ5SIU=\r
+DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
+       :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=bwcHunGEWUCNUaC+\r
+       NJ56+LwSVizay+234tFs92MVQwBLPVaJplkkmplh2pKHrrkpgOo6u1RSofF6L0q3\r
+       kZSDMWxuh9VTjndj7RsQkD+udd4rb+NJGpR8S/9llx4Lmk5i5X07KmSPyyGKyKli\r
+       vLXMGXktW7CVyVi8u47dJzjCFwk=\r
+Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;\r
+       Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:41:41 +0100 (CET)\r
+From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>\r
+To: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: RFC: Dovecot locking\r
+In-Reply-To: <87zkpvv01u.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>\r
+References: <87zkpvv01u.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:50:57 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <m2d3mewe1q.fsf@gnu.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:41:45 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi Rob,\r
+\r
+On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:59:09 -0600, Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> wrote:\r
+\r
+> For now, I'm interested in general comments, i.e. is this desirable, is\r
+> it a reasonable approach, etc.  As you can see, there's no config\r
+> handling yet, so -llockfile is added unconditionally.\r
+\r
+I need this since I can't currently use notmuch-remote due to these\r
+stale files making 'notmuch new' failing.\r
+\r
+I won't comment about your approach since I am no expert both with\r
+notmuch codebase and C :D\r
+\r
+I hope I will be able to play with notmuch-remote soon.\r
+\r
+/Xavier\r