Re: Bug (?) difference 24.1 and 23.3.1
authorSvend Sorensen <svend@ciffer.net>
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 16:54:19 +0000 (09:54 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:48:47 +0000 (09:48 -0800)
05/04b5074e710082c27a443781d98ce99aedded0 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/05/04b5074e710082c27a443781d98ce99aedded0 b/05/04b5074e710082c27a443781d98ce99aedded0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4a7ab45
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+Return-Path: <svend@ciffer.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BD3431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  3 Aug 2012 09:54:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id diWVrAI+kXrd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Fri,  3 Aug 2012 09:54:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.213.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45176431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  3 Aug 2012 09:54:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so1319813yhp.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=AV6ny/Lw2fys160KvroD2O0V3al0U0VsVxvAk6QwC9E=;\r
+       b=eAYdDUoojAWpGvMYWnCAEJOed8IpENWHvWpHS8U8d/Ut1DLCW0tFsVBnlFs6FK89JL\r
+       Yxcdml3MWRqnvR7H+yKUI3nQpL/Gv3+w+It8ew2XO5vSLAkFBWzyzKgwY6ZP7UlQzHTX\r
+       lGysOiOnAqQYS3FIV9enENC6/oc6G+Ev1mtRe2QypLqFrWKFK6Za9kXewHCcm3UoLgit\r
+       MBILJod2EUGuNb2w2my+q6OZrL3T4LLB2b2kJ7JjdK7N532I+PoS8iWRkl0FZf7bahYd\r
+       kG+5/AdxjIb9Z72iOKenk7698dXU0hRutHnT9TH0StkGThWMmNiCbviwi1q4ZjRUfWZF\r
+       tLHA==\r
+Received: by 10.50.208.8 with SMTP id ma8mr4521552igc.41.1344012863837;\r
+       Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (cl-512.phx-01.us.sixxs.net. [2001:1938:81:1ff::2])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm15236194iga.10.2012.08.03.09.54.22\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Svend Sorensen <svend@ciffer.net>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Bug (?) difference 24.1 and 23.3.1\r
+In-Reply-To: <m37gtg9qzq.fsf@quad.robs.office>\r
+References: <m37gtg9qzq.fsf@quad.robs.office>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.50.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:19 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87ipcz9aro.fsf@ciffer.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQl7iKWETiOBB3+4+rrHwvi2TatKXv8R4GC6lZ4I5ARjn9Dbozm7lJRSrlbOaqhFGVM/Ax9i\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:54:26 -0000\r
+\r
+Robert Horn <rjhorn@alum.mit.edu> writes:\r
+\r
+> I didn't find a reference to this bug, but before digging in deeper I'll\r
+> ask if this is a duplicate.  When viewing the same email message using\r
+> emacs 24.1 and 23.3.1 I get an error in 24.1.\r
+>\r
+> The error is: \r
+> mm-inline-text-html: Symbol's value as variable is void:\r
+> gnus-inhibit-images\r
+>\r
+> Notmuch is version 0.13 from the distribution tar file.\r
+>\r
+> The email has both text/plain and text/html.  Old 23.3.1 color codes the\r
+> text/plain links, and kind of renders the html.  New 24.1 does not color\r
+> code the text, only displays [ text/html ], and none of the html\r
+> contents.  Many of the notmuch view commands fail, but "q" works and\r
+> mail can be skipped.\r
+>\r
+> It looks like a missing dependency of some sort to me, or may some\r
+> functions got renamed.  \r
+\r
+I was also getting an error about gnus-inhibit-images when running emacs\r
+24. Adding (require 'gnus-art) to my emacs config fixed the problem.\r
+\r
+http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/008405.html\r
+\r
+Svend\r