Re: [PATCH] Update crypto test for gmime 2.6.5

diff --git a/61/8e454001e59364f7de9214afeb0d0b963e5b43 b/61/8e454001e59364f7de9214afeb0d0b963e5b43
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8b2d791
--- /dev/null
+++ b/61/8e454001e59364f7de9214afeb0d0b963e5b43
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AB9431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:49:04 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id JLlcpVrtdDNj for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:49:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9890B431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:49:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501)\r
+       id 358C368055; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:49:01 +0200 (EET)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update crypto test for gmime 2.6.5\r
+In-Reply-To: <1329840343-10026-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net>\r
+References: <1329840343-10026-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+198~g922c4d2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:49:01 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <m2obssyvwi.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:49:04 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:05:43 +0100, Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net> wrote:\r
+> gmime 2.6 had a bug [1] which made it impossible to tell why a signature\r
+> verification failed when the signer key was unavailable (empty "sigstatus" field\r
+> in the JSON output). Since 00b5623d the corresponding test is marked as broken\r
+> when using gmime 2.6 (2.4 is fine).\r
+> \r
+> The bug has been fixed in gmime 2.6.5. Consequently, the crypto test needs to be\r
+> adjusted so that it is only marked broken for gmime 2.6.4 and below.\r
+> \r
+> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668085\r
+> ---\r
+> \r
+> Hello world,\r
+> \r
+> Here's a little update about gmime 2.6. The latest version (2.6.5)\r
+> fixes the little regression introduced in 2.6.\r
+> \r
+> In all honesty, I'm not sure adding such a workaround in the test\r
+> suite is worth the effort. If gmime 2.6.5 is quickly packaged by major\r
+> distros (it's already in Arch), we could as well make notmuch depend\r
+> on gmime >= 2.6.5. (One line to change in configure). Or we could just\r
+> stop trying to mark the test as broken and let it fail for buggy\r
+> versions of gmime.\r
+> \r
+> What do you think?\r
+\r
+I'm in favor of gmime >= 2.6.5 requirement.\r
+\r
+> \r
+> Best regards,\r
+> Thomas\r
+\r
+Tomi\r