Re: [PATCH] How to improve the mail handling workflow?

diff --git a/61/9f1ce522e6997aa3c249fb1e923a5246a59a24 b/61/9f1ce522e6997aa3c249fb1e923a5246a59a24
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..5846ad5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/61/9f1ce522e6997aa3c249fb1e923a5246a59a24
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333FF40DDE3\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:09:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.99\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
+       DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Eg3qRdf5uZzD for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:09:25 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from homiemail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com\r
+       [208.97.132.81])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0043D40DDC0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:09:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from homiemail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by homiemail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F484B0060;\r
+       Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:09:24 -0800 (PST)\r
+DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject\r
+       :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
+       content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=fyz0lU6kCtdAS4FsyF6wMogc12g\r
+       iTfdb0dBT4rAnOiCaBBL3u8HHMO+RAPz+GnIg713fs4Zo1g+9orxyFnXAKlQaZ6f\r
+       uLsUkc00ZO9BJAMceMFCB3uogmK85nLDM16QCsSmz/lMhh393gGoFIiUi/INyy0I\r
+       tvAW0uWbMo5vPqkQ=\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to\r
+       :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
+       content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=hiLCFYynH97nCjp4BRA+k0aFPmc=; b=g\r
+       GCmSVSlogSDSBRhCQdlhfgtnHJA6KxpoZ3gHDFVtVV2VlBsy/lLsyd6iDs1TyaBS\r
+       cQ6JqKn5qtv+A/eI+lU/Vq6vqC5/uTCRTCnHImG3mFPAXlGz26Sd4fN8WScoPLei\r
+       a9MVcy/CrqqqxVpdGlBWyMBJS39eIEnBwbK4VbbSuI=\r
+Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [84.55.209.24])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)\r
+       by homiemail-a23.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 660B44B0058; \r
+       Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:07:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);\r
+       Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:04 +0100\r
+From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
+To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+       Matthieu Lemerre <racin@free.fr>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] How to improve the mail handling workflow?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87iq02wo8i.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <87fwv65zw1.fsf@free.fr> <87iq02wo8i.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <878w0v4nt4.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:09:35 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:33:33 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:\r
+> I agree that the function currently bound to space bar is annoying.  I\r
+> am actually in the middle of preparing a patch to fix this.  I think\r
+> that space should just scroll through the open messages.  I don't want\r
+> it to archive anything, or pop out of the currently viewed thread.  I\r
+> think this function is too aggressive as is.\r
+\r
++1 for not switching to the next thread. I often do it by accident.\r
+\r
+> I agree that some built-in support for handling "deleted" tags is called\r
+> for, but in the mean time it's very easy to make your own custom\r
+> functions to drop into your emacs config.  I have the following:\r
+>=20\r
+> (define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "d"\r
+>   (lambda ()\r
+>     "delete thread and advance"\r
+>     (interactive)\r
+>     (notmuch-search-add-tag "deleted")\r
+>     (forward-line)))\r
+...\r
+\r
+This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error\r
+messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal\r
+with that or does it simply work for you?\r
+\r
+Sebastian\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAkzgT3gACgkQVYX1jMgnoGISkQCcCDW78hCxDNjQnPvluVEoGyus\r
+CoUAniqiJW/dHRjpLDO0ikhryZmrwkqg\r
+=6Cjh\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r