Re: Search using email headers does not work

diff --git a/eb/84e3bc9434303fd9ddd0309ff007676ee66a62 b/eb/84e3bc9434303fd9ddd0309ff007676ee66a62
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3fb0fa8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/eb/84e3bc9434303fd9ddd0309ff007676ee66a62
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26F4431FC9\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:55:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id OzPZAGnqE92i for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:55:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B080431FC7\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:55:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1U5XBS-00041v-4a; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:55:16 +0000\r
+Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1U5XBR-0002CE-RQ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:55:14 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>,\r
+       Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil@suse.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Search using email headers does not work\r
+In-Reply-To: <87mwv9i9ho.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <20130211145259.GF7346@zelvantb.site>\r
+       <87ehgl92e5.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <877gmdo46y.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <20130212173216.GL7346@zelvantb.site>\r
+       <87wqudi9u0.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87mwv9i9ho.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+255~gff3cc55 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:55:20 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87ip5wlkbb.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 44354469161e4b6eadccffcb1ea60ec2 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:55:21 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the\r
+headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)\r
+satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like\r
+headers:"List-Id: blah" or similar.\r
+\r
+It is not as nice as individually indexed headers, but it does mean that\r
+all notmuch instances would be the same and the same commands would\r
+work, the library interface would be consistent etc.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r
+\r
+ \r
+On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> writes:\r
+>>\r
+>> It's embarrassing to me that I added this note to the notmuch TODO file\r
+>> in October 2009 (and it's still there):\r
+>>\r
+>>     Add support for the user to specify custom headers to be indexed.\r
+>\r
+> One techicality is that we would presumeably want to support this both\r
+> for access via the CLI and via libnotmuch (e.g. for the python\r
+> bindings).  So there is the question of where to store the list of\r
+> indexed headers; perhaps in Xapian metadata. Or is there some simpler\r
+> solution?\r
+>\r
+> d\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r