Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Simplify "unread" tag handling in emacs UI.

diff --git a/11/b65b48e7ba4da4ce6e08aade4e55920a4ea302 b/11/b65b48e7ba4da4ce6e08aade4e55920a4ea302
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a8d8963
--- /dev/null
+++ b/11/b65b48e7ba4da4ce6e08aade4e55920a4ea302
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074E9431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:12:48 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -3.704\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.295,\r
+       BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id JG9IwIKkeUrD for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:12:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC149431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:12:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-72-227-128-66.nyc.res.rr.com\r
+       [72.227.128.66])\r
+       (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
+       by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1HECiNH013571\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
+       Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:12:44 -0500 (EST)\r
+Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
+       id 1Nhkdw-0007O5-2q; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:12:44 -0500\r
+From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,\r
+       Notmuch Mail list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ljes0yy0.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+References: <87ska1vh7r.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87ljes0yy0.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
+Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:12:35 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <874olgc5nw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
+X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Simplify "unread" tag handling in emacs UI.\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:12:48 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:33:11 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.d=\r
+e> wrote:\r
+> I've been using this for quite some time now and I am pretty happy with\r
+> it. However, there is a problem with this approach as this renders the\r
+> function notmuch-show-next-unread-message useless.=20\r
+>=20\r
+> This proceeds to the next message, using\r
+> notmuch-show-next-message, which your patch marks automatically as read.\r
+>=20\r
+> It then checks the unread status in order to decide whether to proceed\r
+> to the next again. So with your patch notmuch-show-next-unread-message\r
+> will skip through all messages in a thread thinking they are all read\r
+> (and actually marking all as read).\r
+\r
+Hey, Sebastian.  I'm glad you've been finding the patch useful.  I'd be\r
+happy to look at improving it, or of course accepting patch.  I was\r
+hoping Carl might process these patch first, in which case it would be\r
+easier to know what any improvements might look like.  I'll send a\r
+separate email to ping Carl about that.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLe/lUAAoJEO00zqvie6q8HGcP/1/OObcck+68fmGJslMbp5+r\r
+X1eTiSBhz5ZMcpomYMp9NrUioZiW4z2zSVV6rrEkcAb3NIP6y4aT+KZS4d9k7PUt\r
+GbCZKNTOdLq/RKFVYK8Q/PNi0OBJBIeEc3HWsJX7zs/fnKQwpjcSt2Qmj3jjUM1C\r
+v3bICOhzdqIlpDtkVOgVRspnr7pAFAhPoRVqJmliTYXseKWqLVeyNGom1emjDKYQ\r
+f3ASf7UwQ2edx0ldVuVHov6IMWUWYXgvXaL7lyuQSfQ0WpjuTtcngMORUAPt62Wb\r
+8a/Vq/HAqhzMrsJ8j3iT+33/P9K409MT40RK7qwJr7GAO6W8eH8zXw5naMvqqm+A\r
+y/7Pucfo+QOLXxtwhZf3JX9Rj+EXuxPYSt7CMamO8AVS09C4LDmrt9d4mh5mmk38\r
+p210cQmgqAawAPSIUkDcttbinitxWtmsI7QU8AVMHKUUURSBdnKbmPXaSw0/DrZa\r
+gvkrGniqQIVOvVspsFTlGjyEblT9LJ2HayFbo4o4jDuR5JRkOMplU/sevtOb5dVq\r
+/PnSlJ3iyqBP/6/9ZOw7zvl4s2gY9BIVm+c5dwNuvvCt7W7NLl1QRH7zRKxaoxDD\r
+6+nJfkGKcBTdkXghrsO432bo0nsAVdv7GcsRGEoweU4dp2/3m0GjBvyc6usLQbNc\r
+542p8ktJyPnv3rWGz8OB\r
+=ARs6\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r