Re: [PATCH 1/3] test: Don't return the result of checking for running emacs to the...

diff --git a/61/9446a16b846ccf7cacb9743be4fd3893934e3f b/61/9446a16b846ccf7cacb9743be4fd3893934e3f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8444b0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/61/9446a16b846ccf7cacb9743be4fd3893934e3f
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D66429E5F\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:52:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id WzPyXbayVlE0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:52:55 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B16429E3B\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:52:54 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by bkty12 with SMTP id y12so613901bkt.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:52:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+       :mime-version:content-type;\r
+       bh=OwRl950VcMv8Yeib9+jaXolhI/y/vnP4tPNnNtOx+mk=;\r
+       b=I86SieO5oH+2rHJ/lB0vSHWbK2N/7QHrhhBtcIIEKxMEwTcMhalRAnocqcQ+/tThfr\r
+       mWNbKtz2hRuh5ew5/6K+5zLYjqxxnTlh1e5Ad+7/qWSJueqNktXYTFYIgBBGFGVYXLIZ\r
+       vffxgBFgAaoUe6l+IqVmaZVNVumGTBA+8H+/g=\r
+Received: by 10.205.131.13 with SMTP id ho13mr6864051bkc.41.1326811973816;\r
+       Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:52:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b9sm47678761bks.6.2012.01.17.06.52.52\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:52:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] test: Don't return the result of checking for running\r
+       emacs to the tester.\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunipkapf7j.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <87pqei327k.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+       <1326809224-22673-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+       <87aa5mxvfv.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+       <cunipkapf7j.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+73~g8a5402e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:51:58 +0400\r
+Message-ID: <87wr8qwfe9.fsf@gmail.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:52:55 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:37:52 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> (And for the list...)\r
+> \r
+> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:20:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> > Can you please elaborate why this is needed?\r
+> \r
+> This code:\r
+> \r
+>                  # wait until the emacs server is up\r
+>                  until test_emacs '()' 2>/dev/null; do\r
+>                          sleep 1\r
+>                  done\r
+> \r
+> outputs 'nil', so the first caller to test_emacs has 'nil\n' prepended\r
+> to their expected output.\r
+\r
+Thanks.  Would be nice to have this explained in the commit message.  No\r
+need to resend just because of this though.\r
+\r
+Regards,\r
+  Dmitry\r