Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot

diff --git a/b4/062407a722188ae7d9410e3160f139c6cdd8af b/b4/062407a722188ae7d9410e3160f139c6cdd8af
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..847c77f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b4/062407a722188ae7d9410e3160f139c6cdd8af
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAC0421186\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:50:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id PVPRWMeDCCw2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:50:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ 0A94D421192   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:50:30 -0700\r
+ (PDT)\r
+Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so1606821wwj.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:50:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by 10.227.184.65 with SMTP id cj1mr1480547wbb.51.1309420229635;\r
+       Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:50:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost ([109.131.21.173])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d19sm1427768wbh.42.2011.06.30.00.50.28\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:50:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+Subject: Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAH-f9Ws8oNb_UzzPNGsw0V29Rh0VTK2Tz0voG0QwLPcKTq1fCw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References:\r
+ <CAH-f9Ws8oNb_UzzPNGsw0V29Rh0VTK2Tz0voG0QwLPcKTq1fCw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-303-g00a1bf6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:50:27 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <874o377o70.fsf@praet.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:50:31 -0000\r
+\r
+On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:53:03 -0400, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:\r
+Non-text part: multipart/mixed\r
+Non-text part: multipart/alternative\r
+> I've spent embarrassingly little time in the emacs UI, so my opinions on\r
+> this should be taken lightly, but I feel like all of the bindings are of the\r
+> form "if W, do X and Y, otherwise do Z" and, as a result, I'm actively\r
+> afraid of what's going to happen when I hit a key. I would much prefer\r
+> bindings with simple, highly predictable behavior. I'm sure there's some\r
+> workflow for which these contextual, compound bindings are fantastic, but\r
+> other workflows wind up fighting against them.\r
+\r
+Very true!\r
+\r
+> I don't have a specific proposal in mind, but Gmail's bindings seem like a\r
+> good model to emulate (the actions, at least; I've never been too fond of\r
+> the specific key choices).\r
+\r
++1\r
+\r
+And AFAIK, "Archive" does *not* mark a message as read in GMail.\r
+(see previous messages suggesting the inverse)\r
+\r
+> On Jun 29, 2011 6:40 PM, "Carl Worth" <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
+Non-text part: text/html\r
+> _______________________________________________\r
+> notmuch mailing list\r
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r
+\r
+\r
+Peace\r
+\r
+-- \r
+Pieter\r