--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468C3431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 12:06:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+ NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id MfDP6x8JqjrI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 28 May 2012 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+ (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69024431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 May 2012 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+ by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1SZ5H2-0005A5-VV; Mon, 28 May 2012 20:06:37 +0100\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+ helo=localhost)\r
+ by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+ (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+ id 1SZ5H2-00050D-Lx; Mon, 28 May 2012 20:06:36 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] cli: make --entire-thread=false work for\r
+ format=json.\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120528233415.GE2331@hili.localdomain>\r
+References: <1338106946-7611-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+ <1338106946-7611-4-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+ <20120528233415.GE2331@hili.localdomain>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13+55~g992aa73 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:06:38 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87txz0m8g1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: e2753ef8ca3839045240680d0416928c (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+ determine if it is\r
+ spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+ This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+ Summary of the scoring: \r
+ * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+ * medium trust\r
+ * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+ * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+ provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+ * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+ * domain\r
+ * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 19:06:40 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, 28 May 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> On Sun, 27 May 2012 09:22:23 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+>> @@ -1036,7 +1047,9 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))\r
+>> switch (format_sel) {\r
+>> case NOTMUCH_FORMAT_JSON:\r
+>> format = &format_json;\r
+>> - params.entire_thread = TRUE;\r
+>> + /* JSON defaults to entire-thread TRUE */\r
+>> + if (entire_thread == ENTIRE_THREAD_DEFAULT)\r
+>> + entire_thread = ENTIRE_THREAD_TRUE;\r
+>> break;\r
+>\r
+> Minor point, but you can defer this until later and keep the logic in\r
+> one place.\r
+>\r
+>> case NOTMUCH_FORMAT_TEXT:\r
+>> format = &format_text;\r
+>> @@ -1058,6 +1071,15 @@ notmuch_show_command (void *ctx, unused (int argc), unused (char *argv[]))\r
+>> params.raw = TRUE;\r
+>> break;\r
+>> }\r
+>> + /* Default is entire-thread = FALSE except for format=json which\r
+>> + * is dealt with above. */\r
+>> + if (entire_thread == ENTIRE_THREAD_DEFAULT)\r
+>> + entire_thread = ENTIRE_THREAD_FALSE;\r
+>> +\r
+>> + if (entire_thread == ENTIRE_THREAD_TRUE)\r
+>> + params.entire_thread = TRUE;\r
+>> + else\r
+>> + params.entire_thread = FALSE;\r
+>\r
+> /* Default is entire-thread = FALSE except for format=json. */\r
+> if (entire_thread == ENTIRE_THREAD_DEFAULT) {\r
+> if (format == &format_json)\r
+> entire_thread = ENTIRE_THREAD_TRUE;\r
+> else\r
+> entire_thread = ENTIRE_THREAD_FALSE;\r
+> }\r
+\r
+Yes I agree that this is cleaner. I will put it in the next version.\r
+\r
+Many thanks for the reviews!\r
+\r
+Mark\r