Re: notmuch-next branch

diff --git a/33/7f6002f15c5c7d3fe65522f655b3d64bb82054 b/33/7f6002f15c5c7d3fe65522f655b3d64bb82054
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a71a792
--- /dev/null
+++ b/33/7f6002f15c5c7d3fe65522f655b3d64bb82054
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6757E40BFDB\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.346\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=1.553, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Ki8Ndzu+9flc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.161.181])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C44240BFD3\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by gxk10 with SMTP id 10so1143056gxk.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received\r
+       :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject\r
+       :from:to:cc:content-type;\r
+       bh=VBB2T0q0sm2R7u/oZ/uUQHySqYYuCtvlAv98hkCnTbE=;\r
+       b=CPH7FF3tt4C8s786phnSqw2OPQCmZOn+Ny2nqLxjTAjaUbKZ7pU2sl+dFXvDsxNYwZ\r
+       4dsYsjErYeHti3iuugtLbGUbquD8Pj1kLGDxMa83sP8XBCsMKOu2l7oZBm0Nh7FovMID\r
+       RMp3etLQrsDnbOBwbX4sarT2GyGKPHIIo6/QE=\r
+DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
+       h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+       :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
+       b=JzKPPbiyz9iUXc1QIoZpVCyLesBVq9VHGo9eWnsnvX5MdiBcDdCR0ACRIg1aUyU2OM\r
+       XC7MjPWBNHzjm9iLCyg/ltp7qtXRUDRXTTt6lYYZdPubb5+hA0B5JDkqCbi2tb9AT8Lb\r
+       XATNzsdLeVXpBqdzOo9dVlmDbzFam8/r36lqo=\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.42.193.210 with SMTP id dv18mr2079778icb.500.1286827824702;\r
+       Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Sender: five9a2@gmail.com\r
+Received: by 10.231.39.204 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:10:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k4loqz34.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <AANLkTimes1ndLhOxJupDh72h1MRR0q28wu7mjAeCOzVu@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87pqvgr1u5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <AANLkTimNeN_2xJWTvKrR+AhKsyj46Ti75bjaVLx8-hrf@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87k4loqz34.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:10:24 +0200\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: iBH_BnyeB-idBBqD-S56FvSCH6Q\r
+Message-ID: <AANLkTikjBjduzwgPm1Lp9e_MS1AOHTvwcuQhNguJ_maa@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch-next branch\r
+From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
+To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:10:36 -0000\r
+\r
+On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 22:00, Jameson Rollins\r
+<jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
+> As long as all the repos are synced, then you only need to track one.\r
+> But notmuch already has "official" repos [0], and making another\r
+> pseudo-"official" repo will probably just makes things more confusing.\r
+\r
+Patches show up in a different order in each person's "personal, but\r
+'synced'" repository.  Then you need a mess of merges to actually get\r
+them synced (if they are published, you can't rebase).\r
+\r
+Jed\r