Re: notmuch reply is confused about multiple (or case-insensitive?) cc headers
authorMark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:37:31 +0000 (15:37 +0100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Sat, 20 Aug 2016 23:22:06 +0000 (16:22 -0700)
a8/b9d8cc285ed3f04631978bb766512d541c2b1d [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/a8/b9d8cc285ed3f04631978bb766512d541c2b1d b/a8/b9d8cc285ed3f04631978bb766512d541c2b1d
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..431e87e
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C3D6DE0222\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.157\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.273,\r
+  DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1,\r
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,\r
+ SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id x3KcPTRViXwW for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:37:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702E06DE009B for\r
+ <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:37:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f126so848256wma.1\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:37:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
+ :mime-version; bh=cHdF99tm+Z79puVQdhtmLH916oK5XL9TeWTrYuCdWLg=;\r
+ b=d9PCIJ14Oq5/g/dDtZkyIwuHh+qSpW/8jUOvlJOQPpDL+F6p0qNhkneeqa+bI162My\r
+ /1tw8KgzhPuoGVvBkOgiiCdsbCn1PDOt2p2tnMbD1Pb40DJSRRxMb6PFQh8BtOSEa1fL\r
+ 6M1kQwZk72NX6QQWOq3+axdWWBPLXenxguslN2adjG0u37Jgf8in0b61g/dw7SGQKGa4\r
+ ucw4ip6zyO7DYyEDmbK5ZPU4lI/mxrc+11UDrgMmNQC/QPN1bAAQBePbx9AYyEG/B+Jq\r
+ OCPHJiRU9Ynfp6pMYlnkcPO1gVAOz8IIJp8oElgLWnl51G5I2UOBu9u78Worw6q2R/wk\r
+ HJMQ==\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
+ h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
+ :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version;\r
+ bh=cHdF99tm+Z79puVQdhtmLH916oK5XL9TeWTrYuCdWLg=;\r
+ b=iIo8py1JZTlrABWlU9ChvZOH3Mgl3wGvXxT7jHlu51J6NmiKsG8lxDQuQU9XVyNaVe\r
+ KTECFEvw4oh1PcMJWMGuYPAens2umag36B4dJt1G7+rt3WM8tyQ3+PfpRHCocU6Yazi+\r
+ JlvytUSASxyRv3L2+dtoB+gzYHLgPwjqDlZ2vtZgru7qLymV4ccI6fIiz80v4t5u/La6\r
+ FZfDEZSn/78eJhKo59xWbFEAKx1jJUzdFmHCOnq7tmNgvGQC4SiidGfRdMU5LL70vr1g\r
+ XLdJOwYdtHtdjGiw992QlrKZfaYKjBIgz/ZbcLRxbjfOBDAt7zyw2xOlXLbRNLp2Z8Jp\r
+ We7w==\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALyK8tJNW8Svvnfkq/f1jOabfbxzSTbm7/jNhHmYul7djrTNEhmRLu/FzYZacNr1MmxONw==\r
+X-Received: by 10.28.214.73 with SMTP id n70mr2718573wmg.13.1466174253740;\r
+ Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:37:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (5751dfa2.skybroadband.com. [87.81.223.162])\r
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u64sm20438349wmd.8.2016.06.17.07.37.32\r
+ (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
+ Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:37:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,\r
+ Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
+ Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: notmuch reply is confused about multiple (or case-insensitive?)\r
+ cc headers\r
+In-Reply-To: <87bn30tdb0.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <87d1ngv95p.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+ <87bn30tdb0.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+30~g42683ad (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:37:31 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87mvmj6fv8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:37:43 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+> Side note #2, I think we should provide *all* versions of reply-headers\r
+> (reply-to-sender, reply-to-all, mail-followup-to, whatnot) in the\r
+> formatted output, and let the user toggle between them in notmuch-emacs\r
+> while composing the reply.\r
+\r
+I did post a series doing some of this many years ago\r
+\r
+id:1368303344-13713-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com\r
+\r
+I don't know how much work it would be to get that into shape (the patch\r
+even mentions JSON rather than sexp).\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r
+\r