Obsolete Patches

diff --git a/97/ae6570cc03b56cde070715c663c1b0bccf5794 b/97/ae6570cc03b56cde070715c663c1b0bccf5794
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..bffd27b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/97/ae6570cc03b56cde070715c663c1b0bccf5794
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B4E431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Mar 2012 13:30:51 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 02gL-BWdWnrF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu,  8 Mar 2012 13:30:50 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703BF431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Mar 2012 13:30:50 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1S5kv8-0006XM-IP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:30:46 +0000\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+       helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1S5kv8-00007a-C7; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:30:46 +0000\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Obsolete Patches\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+308~gb2dba53 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:30:46 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <8762eeixvd.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 02c7219eb5987a2fcbe0227a91e6da24 (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:30:51 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+Hi\r
+\r
+There was a comment on irc about the needs review queue on nmbug status\r
+being large. I think there may be several patches on there that have\r
+been superseded or otherwise made obsolete. This makes choosing what to\r
+review harder.\r
+\r
+My guess is that it is very much easier for the author to know this than\r
+for David (B). Hence I would like to suggest that authors say when their\r
+patches should be removed from the queue.\r
+\r
+I have several patches in this category (in each case I just list the\r
+first patch of the series)\r
+\r
+id:"1328375350-10352-2-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"\r
+(superseded)\r
+\r
+id:"1328388317-20161-2-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" (Dmitry\r
+suggested a better solution)\r
+\r
+id:"1329296619-7463-2-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" (a later\r
+version has been pushed)\r
+\r
+id:"1329900529-16295-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"\r
+(various problems so should be removed; perhaps marked wip)\r
+\r
+id:"1330539189-16593-2-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" (as\r
+much as is relevant has been pushed: it's the revert exclude for 0.12\r
+series)\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r