Re: [PATCH] emacs: notmuch-search: fix faces

diff --git a/06/33719963ed1ff2d760fc5afdd07dfb584957e0 b/06/33719963ed1ff2d760fc5afdd07dfb584957e0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..7981cc2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/06/33719963ed1ff2d760fc5afdd07dfb584957e0
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D4C431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:18:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 8EwKH-CiyFQJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:18:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5890B431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:18:16 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])\r
+       by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE663100030;\r
+       Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:18:22 +0300 (EEST)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@google.com>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: notmuch-search: fix faces\r
+In-Reply-To: <xa1tharngolq.fsf@mina86.com>\r
+References:\r
+ <83882f4c8de5317e0184dc091a197b2341e5f015.1345725028.git.mina86@mina86.com>\r
+       <87ipc4jcfv.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>        <xa1t3938ue0m.fsf@mina86.com>\r
+ <20120828002215.GB11179@mit.edu>      <xa1twr0ju9cq.fsf@mina86.com>\r
+ <20120828021917.GC11179@mit.edu>      <xa1tharngolq.fsf@mina86.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+8~gd6b499d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:18:22 +0300\r
+Message-ID: <m2bohslrn5.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:18:17 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, Aug 28 2012, Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@google.com> wrote:\r
+\r
+>> Quoth Michal Nazarewicz on Aug 28 at  2:51 am:\r
+>>> I'm running Emacs compiled from a week old bzr head, emacs-version\r
+>>> reports: =E2=80=9CGNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) of 201=\r
+2-08-21\r
+>>> on mpn-glaptop=E2=80=9D.\r
+>>>=20\r
+>>> I don't think I have any =E2=80=9Cunusual=E2=80=9D packages, but I do h=\r
+ave quite a bit\r
+>>> of customization, which you might find at\r
+>>> <https://github.com/mina86/dot-files/blob/master/dot-emacs>.\r
+>\r
+> Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> writes:\r
+>> I think the culprit is your "Show blanks and FIXME"\r
+>> font-lock-mode-hook.\r
+>\r
+> No, I've commented it and the problem remained.\r
+\r
+Interesting problem; You could try stripping all customizations\r
+(emacs -q ...) and see whether coloring works -- and if it does\r
+then "bisect" (or something) the culprit.\r
+\r
+Whether we'd use 'face or 'font-lock-face in the future is another\r
+issue which needs good explanation why such change is done.\r
+\r
+> --=20\r
+> Best regards,                                         _     _\r
+> ..o | Computer Science,  Micha=C5=82 =E2=80=9Cmina86=E2=80=9D Nazarewicz =\r
+   (o o)\r
+\r
+Tomi\r