Re: [PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if COND (progn ..." with "(when...

diff --git a/08/9d817eebb95f135ffd8a16484c1cbb68ca0009 b/08/9d817eebb95f135ffd8a16484c1cbb68ca0009
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..b64fb11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/08/9d817eebb95f135ffd8a16484c1cbb68ca0009
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935DC431E64\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:23:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id taMJBTcQvqr8 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:23:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com\r
+ [74.125.82.45])       (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
+ certificate requested)        by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
+ E0336431FBC   for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:23:44 -0800\r
+ (PST)\r
+Received: by wgbdt12 with SMTP id dt12so3757849wgb.2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:23:43 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.180.83.72 with SMTP id o8mr26414503wiy.22.1327915423831;\r
+       Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:23:43 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net\r
+       (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8sm50478206wiy.5.2012.01.30.01.23.41\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:23:42 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000)\r
+       id BD84FA05FB; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:23:40 +0000 (GMT)\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if COND (progn\r
+       ..." with "(when ..."\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ty3fycje.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <87k44uprvy.fsf@praet.org>\r
+       <1326532638-22068-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
+       <87y5ssxam7.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <CAB+hUn-GmONr24nfxBkt59TzHHyZiD1wioYXoPh9wy-rZR-m2g@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <87ty3fycje.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+122~g97bdcf6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
+Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:23:40 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <cunliopilwj.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:23:45 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:45 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> > On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, "David Bremner" <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> >=20\r
+> > Sometimes someone (Dmitry?) sent patches that separated a small functio=\r
+nal\r
+> > change, and the big non-functional indentation change it caused,\r
+> > separately. Would you prefer (or tolerate ;) that style?\r
+>=20\r
+> Hmm, that might be nicer, I'm not 100% sure.\r
+>=20\r
+> I wouldn't say it's mandatory for a patch like this (and I'd say other\r
+> peoples views on what's easy to review are at least as important as mine\r
+> here).\r
+\r
+Each patch should be valid in the repository without any following\r
+patches (preceding are obviously okay). Incorrect indentation would\r
+disqualify a patch from being 'valid', so it shouldn't be accepted.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iEYEARECAAYFAk8mYZwACgkQaezQq/BJZRbCnwCePQkYxeuqSJN0LN21Ryp0e7RH\r
+lq0An1fLBTPbB6O1nDTG7JemvOnXpRDY\r
+=cLDC\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r