Re: [notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool

diff --git a/2f/38737342831d78af70f0ff389305564e8147fc b/2f/38737342831d78af70f0ff389305564e8147fc
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..6b39075
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2f/38737342831d78af70f0ff389305564e8147fc
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FE5431FBD;\r
+       Fri,  4 Dec 2009 10:35:29 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id CiA3CvKM9Y3e; Fri,  4 Dec 2009 10:35:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E62431FAE;\r
+       Fri,  4 Dec 2009 10:35:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 5197C2542FB; Fri,  4 Dec 2009 10:35:28 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+To: Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+In-Reply-To: <87aaxysjdj.fsf@vertex.dottedmag>\r
+References: <1259267025-28733-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net>\r
+       <1259788526-14205-1-git-send-email-dottedmag@dottedmag.net>\r
+       <87zl5zfty5.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87k4x29732.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <87bpiefwdq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87aaxysjdj.fsf@vertex.dottedmag>\r
+Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:35:27 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87aaxyfuz4.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:35:29 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:07:36 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net> wrote:\r
+> The only problem with Cc is that Mailman suppresses duplicate messages and hence\r
+> there is no List-Id: on message.\r
+\r
+Hey, well notmuch doesn't even index the List-Id: header anyway. [*] ;-)\r
+\r
+But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to be\r
+useless. Any reason not to just use something like\r
+to:notmuch@notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this one?\r
+\r
+I think mailman defaults to not allowing messages with the mailing-list\r
+address implicit (such as in a Bcc) so it seems like matching the list\r
+recipient will be more reliable than hoping the List-Id is always there.\r
+\r
+-Carl\r
+\r
+[*] Our TODO list does talk about supporting a configuration parameter\r
+for indexing additional headers of interest.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iD8DBQFLGVZw6JDdNq8qSWgRAq/PAJ0Xmbxt8ULKVwMr//QecvKdQffo/gCfbMj4\r
+odvkm0sTIClM/pndSCFco/w=\r
+=9gGX\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r