er, what absolute links?

diff --git a/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn b/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn
index 04c9b9e90df85ad2a5bbca029fd39fe5d402a3c3..207982c43a877baf87ff3f0b3877d0a8bd580c80 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn
@@ -6,3 +6,8 @@ It looks like all links in websites are absolute paths, this has some limitation
 It would be good if relative paths could be used instead, so the transport method isn't changed unless specifically requested.
 
 Brian May
+
+> Er, which absolute links are you talking about? If you view the source
+> to this page, you'll find links such as "../favicon.ico", "../style.css",
+> "../../", and "../". The only absolute links are to CGIs and the w3c DTD.
+> --[[Joey]]