(no commit message)
authorhttp://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/ <smcv@web>
Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:04:10 +0000 (08:04 -0400)
committeradmin <admin@branchable.com>
Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:04:10 +0000 (08:04 -0400)
doc/bugs/removal_of_transient_pages.mdwn

index dfa14d359a831eef1749927055628dcd177e8ffb..4843b59007b82d50a062a46d0fb033c976033268 100644 (file)
@@ -59,3 +59,15 @@ inconsistent between the one-and two-argument forms. Thoughts?
 > I think required 2-argument would be better, but have not checked
 > all the call sites to see if the `$file` is available split out
 > as that would need. --[[Joey]] 
+
+[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/prune author="[[Simon McVittie|smcv]]"]]
+
+>> Try this, then? I had to make some changes to `attachment`
+>> to make the split versions available. I suggest reviewing
+>> patch-by-patch.
+>>
+>> I also tried to fix a related bug which I found while testing it:
+>> the special case for renaming held attachments didn't seem to work.
+>> (`smcv/wip/rename-held`.) Unfortunately, it seems that with that
+>> change, the held attachment is committed to the `srcdir` when you
+>> rename it, which doesn't seem to be the intention either? --[[smcv]]