From a84b8faf741739f853c0cf4c1258f10e027dcbea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:04:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] --- doc/bugs/removal_of_transient_pages.mdwn | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/bugs/removal_of_transient_pages.mdwn b/doc/bugs/removal_of_transient_pages.mdwn index dfa14d359..4843b5900 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/removal_of_transient_pages.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/removal_of_transient_pages.mdwn @@ -59,3 +59,15 @@ inconsistent between the one-and two-argument forms. Thoughts? > I think required 2-argument would be better, but have not checked > all the call sites to see if the `$file` is available split out > as that would need. --[[Joey]] + +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/prune author="[[Simon McVittie|smcv]]"]] + +>> Try this, then? I had to make some changes to `attachment` +>> to make the split versions available. I suggest reviewing +>> patch-by-patch. +>> +>> I also tried to fix a related bug which I found while testing it: +>> the special case for renaming held attachments didn't seem to work. +>> (`smcv/wip/rename-held`.) Unfortunately, it seems that with that +>> change, the held attachment is committed to the `srcdir` when you +>> rename it, which doesn't seem to be the intention either? --[[smcv]] -- 2.26.2