Re: bug report: notmuch-hello 'All tags' view

diff --git a/77/3a3061327c4978fcb51848042af45dad28d214 b/77/3a3061327c4978fcb51848042af45dad28d214
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2aed6ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/77/3a3061327c4978fcb51848042af45dad28d214
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B3540DAC3\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  3 Nov 2010 14:58:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.9\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id ThTA2xmidyip for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed,  3 Nov 2010 14:57:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C3A40DAC1\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  3 Nov 2010 14:57:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])\r
+       by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950DA19F3344;\r
+       Wed,  3 Nov 2010 22:57:57 +0100 (CET)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS\r
+Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])\r
+       by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,\r
+       port 10044)\r
+       with ESMTP id hvBfeXWt4oYk; Wed,  3 Nov 2010 22:57:56 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])\r
+       by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E53019F3336;\r
+       Wed,  3 Nov 2010 22:57:56 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (unknown [213.29.198.144])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)\r
+       by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06A3915C027;\r
+       Wed,  3 Nov 2010 22:57:56 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.72)\r
+       (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)\r
+       id 1PDlL9-0007jb-Hq; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:57:55 +0100\r
+From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>\r
+To: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>,\r
+       Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: bug report: notmuch-hello 'All tags' view\r
+In-Reply-To: <87r5f3mqdn.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+References: <87pquogrq7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+       <87lj5bv7sn.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+       <87r5f3mqdn.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:57:55 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87y69a2hp8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:58:13 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:17:56 +0000, Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info> wrote:\r
+> Wow, that was probably the most secure bug report in history - this time\r
+> in plain for those of you who don't have access to Carl's private key!\r
+> \r
+> I've noticed since rebasing to 0.4 that I'm seeing an empty entry in the\r
+> 'All tags' view of notmuch-hello which appears to represent a search\r
+> against 'tag:'.  \r
+> \r
+> For some reason this search matches 1,233 of my now 22,905 messages,\r
+> encompassing a date range of about five years and including an\r
+> apparently random collection of both tagged and untagged threads.\r
+> \r
+> Anyone else seeing anything similar?  What else do you need from me to\r
+> track this one down?\r
+\r
+I can confirm this with 0.4 debian package. notmuch search-tags outputs\r
+first line as empty and emacs shows it in All tags view.\r
+\r
+-Michal\r