Re: add delete keybinding

diff --git a/5e/4e7effc441ac70fcc700498f8fb27a7432af7f b/5e/4e7effc441ac70fcc700498f8fb27a7432af7f
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..59c138f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/5e/4e7effc441ac70fcc700498f8fb27a7432af7f
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA4E40CACC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:05:41 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.89\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
+       autolearn=ham\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id o1YG1OTg8QwO; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11001431FC1;\r
+       Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 67EB3568DE9; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:58:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
+To: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: add delete keybinding\r
+In-Reply-To: <1271891763-10757-1-git-send-email-hohndel@infradead.org>\r
+References: <1271891763-10757-1-git-send-email-hohndel@infradead.org>\r
+Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:58:23 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87ochaf12o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:05:41 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:16:02 -0700, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> wr=\r
+ote:\r
+> I'm sending this mostly as an RFC - I use this and like it, but\r
+> people seem to have strong feelings as to how they want to deal=20\r
+> with deleting email (or for some people, how they don't want to\r
+> do that at all).\r
+\r
+I like the idea of adding the deleted tag with a 'd' keybinding.\r
+\r
+I also agree with the comments that suggest that this should be\r
+independent of the archiving operation. (That is, 'd' should just add\r
+the deleted tag and do nothing else.)\r
+\r
+With sup, there was the idea to not make the user add "add not\r
+tag:deleted" to all searches. The way that worked was basically that sup\r
+would append "and not tag:deleted" to all searches except for those that\r
+already had "tag:deleted" in them. This allows deleted messages to give\r
+every appearance of being deleted, (they would not show up in searches),\r
+but a user *could* still find them[*] by explicitly saying "and\r
+tag:deleted" in the search.\r
+\r
+I don't think it makes sense to add a delete keybinding without some\r
+support along the lines of what's described above.\r
+\r
+It does seem out of character for the library or even the command-line\r
+to do interpretation of tag names and munging of search strings like\r
+this. So I think all of the above should be implemented within emacs\r
+code. It's the emacs code that is adding the "deleted" tag so it should\r
+be interpreting its behavior as well.\r
+\r
+=2DCarl\r
+\r
+[*] Until the user did some sort of external expunge operation that\r
+actually deleted the files, of course.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iD8DBQFL0e3P6JDdNq8qSWgRAi+EAJ96+78+2zLVAm6wusynFDZA0vfoTACeN6U3\r
+SLk30pjgY38WYOjXy6Px4Sg=\r
+=cWwB\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r