Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ?

diff --git a/4f/4444f86ad255c4a7f1c1c1eb378957aa0dcbe0 b/4f/4444f86ad255c4a7f1c1c1eb378957aa0dcbe0
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a286f5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/4f/4444f86ad255c4a7f1c1c1eb378957aa0dcbe0
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+Return-Path: <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FB7431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:11:56 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id LNIHDCAqZMUU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:11:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr (zproxy120.enst.fr [137.194.52.34])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DDE431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:11:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00DB100ED0;\r
+       Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:11:39 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)\r
+       with ESMTP id DuIWCsAkP5Nt; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:11:35 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C795B100EEF;\r
+       Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:11:35 +0100 (CET)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy120.enst.fr\r
+Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)\r
+       with ESMTP id FVc5iz3luLpY; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:11:35 +0100 (CET)\r
+Received: from localhost (inf-11879.int-evry.fr [157.159.110.251])\r
+       by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6F9A100ED0;\r
+       Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:11:35 +0100 (CET)\r
+From: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Subject: Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87lhn8fmq9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+References: <877fyseuq8.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+       <87d28ku7rt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+       <871tp0ek8b.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+       <87lhn8fmq9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:11:34 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <877fypre49.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:11:56 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi.\r
+\r
+David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu> writes:\r
+>>\r
+>> I'm using a local dovecot as a mail storage backend, which is in turn\r
+>> indexed my botmuch... any particular thing related to dovecot flags\r
+>> handling maybe (i.e. deleted tag being passed to dovecot) ?\r
+>>\r
+>\r
+> Nope, we rejected synching the T flag to maildirs for exactly this\r
+> reason.  I wonder if you have multiple excluded tags on these messages\r
+> somehow.  If you run "notmuch search --exclude=false tag:deleted" do you\r
+> get some output? If so, what tags do these messages have?\r
+>\r
+\r
+Yes, I get tons of mails (981 of them ;).\r
+\r
+Some only seem to have the deleted tag :\r
+\r
+ $ notmuch search --exclude=false tag:deleted  | grep '(deleted)' | wc -l\r
+ 4\r
+\r
+And it seems I can now find some 21 messages by searching for the\r
+tag:deleted query in emacs :-/\r
+\r
+I've checked my .notmuch-config and it contains :\r
+\r
+ [search]\r
+ exclude_tags=deleted;spam;\r
+\r
+So, I've tried and removed the spam tag from the exclude_tags, and\r
+suddenly, the search in emacs responds with the 981... which means that\r
+most of the deleted ones had the spam tag too.\r
+\r
+\r
+So it means that if one explicitely requests an excluded tag, other\r
+exclude tags still apply. Not sure this is the desirable option : maybe\r
+if one exclusion is waved, then others should too ?\r
+\r
+What do you think ?\r
+\r
+Best regards,\r
+-- \r
+Olivier BERGER \r
+http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8\r
+Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF\r
+Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)\r