1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A7F4196F4
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
\r
13 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id fpeFw6q6+gHe for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB141431FC1
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179E07A8064
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject
\r
26 :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
27 content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=KTexyIPFdxlsHuuIeE9N+JEjVzi
\r
28 bkdyuIx1MiJnOHCLsSEf8rFptmzd37NScCgsarlKkbV1DWgi0IkE4c/178dR5TTt
\r
29 v+AZoOAY85EmgVYN7ngbnOC60ZnyCJOMtoemWPCtARIgUSpEK6GAagHlgXD2bC3E
\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to
\r
32 :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
33 content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=UnFFQXdxeElmoFD6EtwS+iPWRPE=; b=B
\r
34 5qNPAX8hbSlWXuJp5nrcLu4ECSTNCG7McADDWAXd8P8mMgl0FjL4lVRkcRCTZLM4
\r
35 8s+yxGnVK0PlBuJIFJHNkJc+dymIW0g0Bc+OlAJGM6R5QxbyGNl8IeJp5b8PK47A
\r
36 BA8LlQNQeZXechMF6BVvCO31otv0c4kBWHK9ItDaqc=
\r
37 Received: from sspaeth.de (mtec-hg-docking-2-dhcp-040.ethz.ch [82.130.121.40])
\r
38 (Authenticated sender: sebastian@sspaeth.de)
\r
39 by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B60557A805C
\r
40 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
\r
42 Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:21:50 +0200
\r
43 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
44 To: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
45 Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <871vcghz8o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
47 References: <87zkz4xnf4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
48 <871vcghz8o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
49 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-49-g90d15b3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
\r
50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
51 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:21:49 +0200
\r
52 Message-ID: <87631kirbm.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
54 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
55 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
60 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:22:05 -0000
\r
71 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
73 > For that, I think I want the current '|' binding to pipe the current
\r
74 > message and then a new binding ("M-|" ?) to pipe every (open) message in
\r
78 > Which makes me think that other operations should work similarly. '+'
\r
79 > and '-' should change tags on the current message (as they do currently)
\r
80 > and then new "M-+" and "M--" could change tags on all (open) messages in
\r
84 > That would highlight the current 'a' as out of place since it's
\r
85 > currently archiving every message in the thread. So I'd then fix it to
\r
86 > be 'a' for the current message and "M-a" for every (open) message in the
\r
89 It would indeed be out of place, but I would like to voice support for
\r
90 the status-quo. In General I like to press as few keys as possible
\r
91 (since I use emacs my meta keys are getting worn out quite quickly).
\r
93 and I usually archive whole threads rather than single messages, so I
\r
94 would vote for "a" as archive thread. Is it inconsistent? Yes. Does it
\r
95 let me press fewer keys? Yes...
\r
97 Anyway, I can always customize it the way I like it best :-)
\r
102 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
104 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
105 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
107 iEYEARECAAYFAkwXRi4ACgkQVYX1jMgnoGLSPACdEZ+z26J25UALGxz+QxHobXQT
\r
108 /6QAniSo32vD4zVr/FkKCUoxTJ4b1lCH
\r
110 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r