Re: Batch tagging - add id_list as tag possible?
[notmuch-archives.git] / fa / f382ba4d92adef55f9152e00074c50d6bb4a0b
1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B9B40BC61\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:47:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -1.99\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
13         DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id zxzmOLWDf9lQ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:46:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com\r
19         [208.97.132.81])\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFEF40BC64\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:46:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
23         by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38EC7A8063;\r
24         Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:46:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject\r
26         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
27         content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=HSvpFyg+8Que+gDfuLibYyJFaX4\r
28         nsPOfu9fkRxczII7VxR0kVamE9m8AyVVrw6ilS2XY+7lvAo/tLmvaFTAEW02/rut\r
29         SVrQvfEmKW2dzRQCO8lBmCJnXIEHR+oQ938nKpw4D5eoeJilxATZsTGZW/aXMiiJ\r
30         UyLIYSiBeQQohoqU=\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to\r
32         :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:\r
33         content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=dGDz1KfZpWat+lO5DDUGDVcZSn8=; b=K\r
34         aHIhjkU7LUqA+WsTgZMhdX60RAE9WndzzcxzmBv2Nh9tiJFENIRGb8tVa40HbPhJ\r
35         wvPTMSjCbsFFBBqch83QrUWIy6YmKeWjYh3BZwefdbt3mhuthngxf5lENdCxlJWt\r
36         l9a79CdS/VV5jRunajG35nIrMYkd7DXczPwpLJhE0Q=\r
37 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [62.48.118.26])\r
38         (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)\r
39         by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 070BF7A805C; \r
40         Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:46:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
41 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);\r
42         Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:46:33 +0200\r
43 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>\r
44 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
45 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Use "g" instead of "=" for refreshing hello\r
46  screen.\r
47 In-Reply-To: <87aaom88b5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
48 References: <87k4nxcque.fsf@tger.linkoping.osa>\r
49         <87aaom88b5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-58-g6607fd6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.50.1\r
51         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
52 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:46:28 +0200\r
53 Message-ID: <87iq39ohx7.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
54 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
55 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
56         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
59 Precedence: list\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
61         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
68         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:47:11 -0000\r
70 \r
71 --=-=-=\r
72 \r
73 > I must admit that I do see the logic of this patch.  'g' is a little\r
74 > more consistent with other things that I've seen.\r
75 \r
76 I agree, 'g' makes sense to me.\r
77 \r
78 Sebastian\r
79 \r
80 --=-=-=\r
81 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
82 \r
83 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
84 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
85 \r
86 iEYEARECAAYFAkxqMEQACgkQVYX1jMgnoGIcZwCfdNGIxt3nQMo094LvNaluLW5O\r
87 t1IAnA+8NKA9cO5GTCefECFNirle4ouG\r
88 =9DA2\r
89 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
90 --=-=-=--\r