1 Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FB34048C8
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:13 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-1.291, BAYES_40=-0.185] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id nhO5iI8jsCMx for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A6E4048C2
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so95245fgg.2
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:10 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
23 h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:subject
\r
24 :to:in-reply-to:references;
\r
25 bh=a4eBQmk5kcSYcLjKEuI219uvIeggYJ5f+PdvNXQghfI=;
\r
26 b=uwp9aqCdvFPstmkNayZJt/t7clcTJmrm6HK/TD1VdUNNDmoJwvIgqGsR2G0mTAychS
\r
27 6+DoFkQNJ2bmehUm4CwQrmL7IXSaz/ZkHL9ZEEGdpsvA2gzZk3iIGw4zFjPnlLGalvyb
\r
28 V73zL4Xy1fBvbOGTTungjwWmtVTPLpgPmuKWM=
\r
29 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
30 h=message-id:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:references;
\r
31 b=EXmzlUT59xh6utqj8dD0JqsU1VTaY0DTtKOOT6lQ6NlvZ0IgffzJHunFcFM5tS5T4g
\r
32 sGz2D76BBUgxHraCc2pS27ICMf4g/zI/VH/dENUSTWAL98dn0KAA6bLsbMlGllsf+oxa
\r
33 81m0cqLdkrljwlQyrfk7aX5Gyfk68DgpxAduw=
\r
34 Received: by 10.103.84.21 with SMTP id m21mr1301306mul.106.1268347270293;
\r
35 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:10 -0800 (PST)
\r
36 Received: from localhost (physnat56.physics.umass.edu [128.119.50.56])
\r
37 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm1685314mue.15.2010.03.11.14.41.08
\r
38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
\r
39 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
40 Message-ID: <4b997185.07a5660a.68e5.3260@mx.google.com>
\r
41 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:41:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
42 From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
43 To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org,
\r
45 In-Reply-To: <878wa8sdbq.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
46 References: <1264272821-sup-5331@ben-laptop>
\r
47 <1264368215-7101-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
48 <1264368215-7101-2-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
49 <1264368215-7101-3-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
50 <878wa8sdbq.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
51 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] Build and link against notmuch shared
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:41:13 -0000
\r
67 On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:25:45 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:
\r
68 > I just tried out this patch to compile notmuch as a shared library and
\r
69 > while producing lib/libnotmuch.so.1 it fails to find notmuch later:
\r
71 Try the version I just posted. It will apply against master and builds on my machine.
\r
73 > Is more needed than this patch? Also, *I* think it would be nice to
\r
74 > support --static or --shared as options to --configure. But that is a
\r
75 > minor thing, probably.
\r
77 What do others think about this? Would it be useful, counter-productive, or
\r
78 none of the above to allow configuration of the library type?
\r