f2/6651e6e62552855cd51530532d741def431d89

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A57B431FB6\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
  13         autolearn=unavailable\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id Na52EeofCEAe for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
  19         [131.215.239.19])\r
  20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D9A431FAF\r
  21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
  22 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  23         by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A2D2E508EC;\r
  24         Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:17 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
  26 Received: from finestructure.net (m17.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.115.117])\r
  27         (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
  28         by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F042E50B75;\r
  29         Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
  30 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  31         id C2C3EAE6; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
  32 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  33 To: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,\r
  34         David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
  35         Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  36 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)\r
  37 In-Reply-To: <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com>\r
  38 References: <1340815565-21083-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org>\r
  39         <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  40         <87hatwqoz9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87ehozmpcq.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
  41         <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com>\r
  42 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+54~ga0426dc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
  43         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  44 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700\r
  45 Message-ID: <87fw9fwgp4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  46 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  47 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  48         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  51 Precedence: list\r
  52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  53         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  55         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  61 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:21:22 -0000\r
  62 \r
  63 --=-=-=\r
  64 \r
  65 On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> wrote:\r
  66 > Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of\r
  67 > letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having\r
  68 > some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip\r
  69 > between the two options so one can change one's mind after typing up the\r
  70 > reply?\r
  71 \r
  72 This is a good idea.  The other idea I had was to have 'r' query the\r
  73 user directly about whether or not they want to reply all before\r
  74 constructing the reply template.  Or right before you're about to send.\r
  75 \r
  76 jamie.\r
  77 \r
  78 --=-=-=\r
  79 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  80 \r
  81 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  82 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
  83 \r
  84 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP7IR3AAoJEO00zqvie6q814AP/i+Xxb0KBO3ciQcdfcuOk5eh\r
  85 +Z60q0VJfE2COB49pHxuWWa8cB3BDo6Ymjpjnd1HNdDeZB4+G0AI5/yA1EEAfAVJ\r
  86 099zRvF0yEqoVFWFPutp8V1tLhQeUEFjDsvkqfJnu+d8nHUuAyzwtMU6LRTtdLlj\r
  87 o0v9LJG2u10ihtOsFXbVHj4ZmetOrkH5g24NLVjSdYKZtCB7MpfcgQ1MGjfgAFqW\r
  88 mOHTpi2ADEYp5cBST42NYaOW82X+yKyLQFC8rp05tNNRvFu/868XggArI+UiclI0\r
  89 GUSpr2dfXXU1Iq2PiJ5sNgLNpNVqZ48HGJoyLqv9VCL28AZdqWn/z+wFkNSU7cjr\r
  90 fybLc4psPTibWfCUVNL84ErazubWiLX1xXnH/RFUy6Oqtnyia1QAnIvJZzlEoxOk\r
  91 KYLohPAQsRdzN0hCVgFS6GF5/JUE600NeQAR86mbGfbN7C8YiLnxbEsNNEqkVKyh\r
  92 8bjjyLi868wXyiOV7p7KilUc6/TTunvcQK21w80M8u1bc9+gQZXXd7lQ5KY9PhXv\r
  93 UXgMaEMmSnavWzTntiIDSLhNo7wd773jTRc+uC2JzEddfk62MmG3Td8f1dQiQOC/\r
  94 x5nmYlYmBznaHpboTJ2WmnlvmvFqlI/vqU2j2UvFT41PszhbaeFFKs4QQnXg5iRu\r
  95 eZuy13FGFq4YyMywWilw\r
  96 =LQjL\r
  97 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  98 --=-=-=--\r