2 <return-wjwb7w6bbxy77dhqms2eum4pp6@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
\r
3 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
5 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
6 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624FC431FAF
\r
7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
\r
8 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
12 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
13 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id v4pdr9kHARM3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (market.scs.stanford.edu [171.66.3.10])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46D8431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost.scs.stanford.edu
\r
24 [127.0.0.1]) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id
\r
25 s3I07Y6O014355; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
26 Received: (from dm@localhost)
\r
27 by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s3I07Y4t009194;
\r
28 Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
\r
29 X-Authentication-Warning: market.scs.stanford.edu: dm set sender to
\r
30 return-wjwb7w6bbxy77dhqms2eum4pp6@ta.scs.stanford.edu using -f
\r
31 From: David Mazieres <dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu>
\r
32 To: Allan Streib <astreib@indiana.edu>
\r
33 Subject: Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <877g6ny3iw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
35 References: <871twvokwm.fsf@viking.indiana.edu>
\r
36 <877g6ny3iw.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
37 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:07:34 -0700
\r
38 Message-ID: <878ur37b5l.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
41 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
45 Reply-To: David Mazieres expires 2014-07-16 PDT
\r
46 <mazieres-tnzx3thbrpqukbfpgvb2huwbe2@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 00:07:45 -0000
\r
58 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
\r
60 > Allan Streib <astreib@indiana.edu> writes:
\r
62 >> I've been using notmuch on OpenBSD for a while, and I really appreciate
\r
65 Since there is a thread on this...
\r
67 I'm using notmuch 0.17 on openbsd (from the ports tree). My problem is
\r
68 that notmuch new is just unbearably slow. I don't know if it's because
\r
69 I'm running the 32-bit (i386) mode or what, but it takes over one second
\r
70 per mail message. E.g., this is typical of what I see when checking for
\r
73 Processed 18 total files in 20s (0 files/sec.).
\r
74 Added 5 new messages to the database.
\r
76 Linux is 10 times faster. Have you seen any similar performance issues?
\r