1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC00431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id jP1R5Opfbv1M for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98168431FAF
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
24 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
25 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
26 id 1Sgt4d-0004GL-Gd; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:42:06 +0100
\r
27 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]
\r
29 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)
\r
30 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
31 id 1Sgt4d-0003YO-8t; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:42:03 +0100
\r
32 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
33 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
34 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
35 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler
\r
36 In-Reply-To: <1334438868-17168-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
37 References: <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
38 <1334438868-17168-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+63~g548a9bf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
40 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
41 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:42:01 +0100
\r
42 Message-ID: <8762an4uk6.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
45 X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223
\r
46 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
47 X-QM-Body-MD5: 3d25b672e9098124a0da1b3a6427e7b9 (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
48 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8
\r
49 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -
\r
50 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
52 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
53 This message scored -1.8 points.
\r
54 Summary of the scoring:
\r
55 * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
\r
57 * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]
\r
58 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
59 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
60 * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
\r
62 * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
63 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
64 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
65 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
67 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
68 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
71 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
72 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
73 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
74 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
75 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
76 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:42:12 -0000
\r
78 On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
79 > The new function 'notmuch-mua-mailto' provides an interactive handler
\r
80 > for rfc6068 "mailto:" URIs. It attempts to implement the rfc6068
\r
81 > specification: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6068
\r
83 > More decoding of the mailto string needs to be done, as is evident by
\r
84 > the fact that the mailto test remains broken.
\r
86 > Rebased against current master.
\r
88 Hi I have just been playing with this and it seems to work well. Indeed,
\r
89 I have not come across any "real" links that it fails on. (All the
\r
90 links on http://www.mailto.co.uk/ seem to work for example.)
\r
92 What is your experience? If it only fails on contrived examples then I
\r
93 am much happier about including it.
\r
95 I only had one comment on the lisp:
\r
97 > + (notmuch-mua-mail to subject other-headers)
\r
101 (notmuch-mua-mail to subject other-headers nil (notmuch-mua-get-switch-function))
\r
103 it respects the users preference on where to open the new message.
\r