1 Return-Path: <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E39429E25
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id F9nhV9ktyo6h for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDE6431FD0
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
\r
21 (envelope-from <gmn-notmuch@m.gmane.org>) id 1QbVi9-0008Iv-Hw
\r
22 for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:40:05 +0200
\r
23 Received: from irdmzpr01-ext.ir.intel.com ([192.198.151.36])
\r
24 by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
\r
26 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:40:05 +0200
\r
27 Received: from jani by irdmzpr01-ext.ir.intel.com with local (Gmexim 0.1
\r
28 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
\r
29 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:40:05 +0200
\r
30 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
\r
31 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
32 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
33 Subject: Re: bug in emacs-ui ?
\r
34 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:35:48 +0000 (UTC)
\r
36 Message-ID: <loom.20110628T122607-292@post.gmane.org>
\r
37 References: <8739j5rn2d.fsf@cern.ch>
\r
38 <87pqm8cz4f.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
\r
39 <87oc1spkkc.fsf@cern.ch>
\r
40 <87mxhccw9v.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
\r
41 <87hb7kpi7e.fsf@cern.ch>
\r
42 <87fwn4cm9q.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
\r
43 <BANLkTin=viaP4US-=qj2x7BQOKhGaLeaHw@mail.gmail.com>
\r
44 <87hb7jg2rl.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
\r
45 <878vsv9eam.fsf@cern.ch> <87oc1qet0v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
46 <87ei2m8imo.fsf@cern.ch> <87pqm6f059.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
49 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
\r
50 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
\r
51 X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
\r
52 User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
\r
53 X-Loom-IP: 192.198.151.36 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
\r
54 rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0)
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:40:18 -0000
\r
69 Carl Worth <cworth@...> writes:
\r
72 > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:50:23 +0200, Sebastien Binet
\r
73 > <seb.binet@...> wrote:
\r
74 > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:09:20 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@...> wrote:
\r
75 > > > Perhaps this is an emacs bug?
\r
78 > > > I'm using Debian's emacs 23.3.1 and have not encountered the problem
\r
80 > > I don't see anything related to 'point', 'point-invisible-p' nor
\r
81 'forward-char' in there:
\r
82 > > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/emacs23/23.3+1-1
\r
84 > Perhaps I was confused. I thought 23.3.1 was a distinct upstream release
\r
85 > From 23.3, but maybe not, (emacs version numbers use 1-based indexing
\r
88 > > anyways... for the moment I'll just live with it...
\r
92 > > except if somebody has some insights on how to "catch" the 'End of
\r
93 > > buffer' error and add some more protective programming around the
\r
94 > > 'scroll-up' function ?
\r
96 > My emacs lisp skills are primarily restricted to actual
\r
97 > experimentation. So if I can replicate the bug, I might be able to find
\r
98 > a fix. I'm not very good at doing theoretical fixes with emacs lisp
\r
101 I bisected the problem to commit 95ef8da29439f2e79115c36ab4d2a80aef1a1462 ("Fix
\r
102 hiding a message while some citations are shown in notmuch-show view").
\r
103 Reverting that fixes the problem for me. (If you don't want to resolve
\r
104 conflicts, also revert 432e091924c1d1d8950a44ca78bc5b9c5ade47e4 first.) I don't
\r
105 have the time just now to try to figure out the problem in that, but perhaps
\r
106 this will help others go forward.
\r