Re: Applying patches directly from emails?
[notmuch-archives.git] / ee / 4328e2c3f8d64e55ce7175d6ffe4ac2760f52f
1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D4C429E22\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 May 2011 18:31:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id Yy04BZ9X4XZW for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Sun,  8 May 2011 18:31:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
18         [131.215.239.19])\r
19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A725431FB5\r
20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 May 2011 18:31:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
21 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
22         by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44EE328241;\r
23         Sun,  8 May 2011 18:26:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
25 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com\r
26         [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
27         by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A923281FA;\r
28         Sun,  8 May 2011 18:26:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
29 Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
30         id 46D79C9D; Sun,  8 May 2011 18:31:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
32 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
33         Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
34 Subject: Re: release-candidate/0.6\r
35 In-Reply-To: <4DC74264.1070701@fifthhorseman.net>\r
36 References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
37         <87iptkfzwx.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
38         <4DC74264.1070701@fifthhorseman.net>\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-191-g89ca01b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
40         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
41 Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 18:31:27 -0700\r
42 Message-ID: <874o54u0b4.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
43 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
44 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
45         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
46 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
47 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
48 Precedence: list\r
49 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
50         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
51 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
52         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
53 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
54 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
55 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
56 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
58 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 01:31:35 -0000\r
59 \r
60 --=-=-=\r
61 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
62 \r
63 On Sun, 08 May 2011 21:24:52 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.=\r
64 net> wrote:\r
65 > One new feature that you didn't mention is that --decrypt is passed\r
66 > through to notmuch reply based on the state of the current buffer.\r
67 >=20\r
68 > That is: it used to be that you had to remember whether you'd viewed a\r
69 > thread with M-RET or RET (to trigger decryption+verification) and adjust\r
70 > your reply invocation to match if you wanted proper quoting and\r
71 > attribution when replying to encrypted mail.\r
72 \r
73 Thanks for point that out, dkg.  I did forget to mention that.\r
74 \r
75 Now we just need to figure out how to auto-encrypt replies to encrypted\r
76 messages...\r
77 \r
78 jamie.\r
79 \r
80 --=-=-=\r
81 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
82 \r
83 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
84 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
85 \r
86 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNx0PvAAoJEO00zqvie6q8qesQAKNC40QDKS4fSDoeZRGZgxIV\r
87 fhkJN521edPwbhxNtxZBG9ICu2v0+g3hqKom2qz9q76WiQvwhAy8smYbIdSBKBS4\r
88 V9b0iB5UnTmTWQFLprMsvD+F8Si8Onz0Dqaq0k0HWwQltbCTUgs8Z+exEZDdWzNT\r
89 hDWkl/J03nApNSgxNyXyBhb82OtrQlE8nS6b2s61F9/IJOaEWtt3Lo7WZoli0TvL\r
90 2k9QkWMARtzRegUKRQCkuOxzi3Esuo+Acn0Rf9fJOBjraSZsoejkbO002A+FUVGx\r
91 gXe0p28MvGwVB/jwidlQsf4ZCWbnZwUDZ+1O0QstjOYRuyYX5U/ZMJDbJikbk2mO\r
92 JJk0YqLbzUi4qhcvEyP5f9z+pRzQAQ0T9SqtiyeBpDH3ggLFG5WxLps4YFhUuAU0\r
93 YyKn2MbTCiultp8vBek/fCTvjqzP2xhgwf/KLD+8jqu0Fhzzc1xwG6yGqA2WsMYK\r
94 ssWOmV8uwMkYZQYhpobtptwmUFbuqKO2OLuvO817z2+/vRiikBJujF5QTxoTQdYj\r
95 ntv6K6GN2W6GvlNX+prIfuyqQ2OqqDf9jH7OqBDKgFKXkcE6Rd5eR1s/28suTR0+\r
96 KmgpSE5A2Me65ri/TaEl0u+cC15CN1pNjEeQ+GpByvP5S2VUpC6gpClWHlA31ohQ\r
97 U3ZAG2gnVwwrqWefa/Qg\r
98 =f3EV\r
99 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
100 --=-=-=--\r