1 Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24FB429E4A
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:35 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id dS+79SLT5a11 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:35 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A092429E45
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:35 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by wibhr12 with SMTP id hr12so2322387wib.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:33 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.180.100.234 with SMTP id fb10mr14029384wib.5.1326714393891;
\r
25 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:33 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from localhost ([109.131.75.86])
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id di5sm33543325wib.3.2012.01.16.03.46.33
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
29 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:46:33 -0800 (PST)
\r
30 From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
31 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
32 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Don't attempt to colour tags in
\r
33 `notmuch-show-mode'.
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <cunmx9n51u4.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
35 References: <1325004434-24583-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
36 <87aa5nlwwg.fsf@praet.org>
\r
37 <cunmx9n51u4.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+78~g6c58370 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
39 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
40 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:44:44 +0100
\r
41 Message-ID: <8762gbvplf.fsf@praet.org>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:46:36 -0000
\r
58 On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:22:27 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
59 > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:17:03 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
60 > > Alas, those text properties actually *were* effective (and I liked them :)
\r
62 > Well, not in emacs 24. My reading of the source was that overlays were
\r
63 > intended to stomp on text properties, but that could have been wrong.
\r
65 > Do they look correct when you add/remove tags?
\r
67 Yup, they do; But I'm still chillin' with v23.3.1.
\r
69 No problem. For the time being, I'll just make do with
\r
70 reverting 4b256ff5 on my local branch.
\r