1 Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D399431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:23:58 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id mVmJg84V3Vif for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:23:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4D8431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:23:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by wico1 with SMTP id o1so270319wic.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:23:54 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pieter@praet.org designates
\r
25 10.216.131.215 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.131.215;
\r
26 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com;
\r
27 spf=pass (google.com: domain of pieter@praet.org
\r
28 designates 10.216.131.215 as permitted sender)
\r
29 smtp.mail=pieter@praet.org
\r
30 Received: from mr.google.com ([10.216.131.215])
\r
31 by 10.216.131.215 with SMTP id m65mr3552128wei.54.1330637034948
\r
32 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:23:54 -0800 (PST)
\r
33 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
34 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
35 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
36 :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
\r
37 bh=mKizNGEo4Wva7RPBJ41aCx2t0yvLmvnpjS6Wr5nsUvo=;
\r
38 b=jHJiM7KOIZJAUG814hFaib8Pc9NtcoC8iSL16AnWRD3e2OQTOp5qwn3oeq9Sa1Ydlq
\r
39 uAELzjWb70sJA6pKDVT7cL7tjBdOlDY3MNzGkBkI85v7ovCQM6DRxGqj5xONYkN5fy1K
\r
40 755D3uSmoyQ6NPHg6lW3RMCrq+53cQNqyhHilj31fRToW4v7cqKMXqeoa+8UGPP6mo8u
\r
41 7IOStVVnU7YDRtyl4jha2KBWZxQG5mHlmkiSWARFM00yWTt5neSv0bUQgTMrU74rr8VD
\r
42 80Ypi53Y4qEwfJqfoF3fvGNU2pDlZIOM4hnN7su0CjowwsTYDHUmbnZFpf2vzByZsUNC
\r
44 Received: by 10.216.131.215 with SMTP id m65mr2850549wei.54.1330637034728;
\r
45 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:23:54 -0800 (PST)
\r
46 Received: from localhost ([109.131.111.80])
\r
47 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id er8sm15846183wib.1.2012.03.01.13.23.53
\r
48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
49 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:23:54 -0800 (PST)
\r
50 From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
51 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 Subject: Re: plans for 0.12
\r
53 In-Reply-To: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
54 References: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
55 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+210~g6afc43e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
56 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
57 Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100
\r
58 Message-ID: <877gz4dnl2.fsf@praet.org>
\r
60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
62 ALoCoQkhiDAHc4/I2FHrVQjTtGjlg/TT9Jg0nqVh0i4onr4phgq5Ru5FzuzcmCS2kYzmRaOY+1FO
\r
63 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
64 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
66 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
67 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
70 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
71 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
72 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
73 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
74 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
75 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:23:58 -0000
\r
77 On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
79 > I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12
\r
80 > within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date.
\r
82 > If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free
\r
83 > to follow up. The main point here is bug fixes, or features which are
\r
84 > there in a kindof half baked way.
\r
87 Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any
\r
88 test coverage yet. Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ?
\r
89 (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely asking for opinions)
\r
92 Anyways, I've taken the liberty of tagging the following patches '0.12':
\r
94 - test: emacs: toggle processing of cryptographic MIME parts in `notmuch-show'
\r
95 - id:"1329684990-12504-2-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"
\r
96 - test: emacs: toggle eliding of non-matching messages in `notmuch-show'
\r
97 - id:"1329684990-12504-3-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"
\r
98 - test: emacs: toggle thread content indentation in `notmuch-show'
\r
99 - id:"1329684990-12504-4-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"
\r
101 - test: emacs: new tests "notmuch-show: {add,remove} multiple tags {to,from} single message"
\r
102 - id:"1330122640-18895-2-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"
\r
103 - test: emacs: new test "notmuch-show: change tags of all messages in current buffer"
\r
104 - id:"1330122640-18895-3-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"
\r
106 - test: emacs: new test "notmuch-search: change tags of all matching messages"
\r
107 - id:"1329936867-923-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"
\r
109 If applied in that order, the last one needs to be applied with the
\r
110 `--3way' option, which results in an easily resolved merge conflict,
\r
111 but if needed, I'll rebase it.
\r
114 > Bug fix wise, I know about
\r
116 > id:"1330068983-4483-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz"
\r
118 > This could use some review.
\r
120 > It has also been some chatter that either (the next iteration of)
\r
122 > id:"1329296619-7463-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"
\r
124 > Should go in, or we should revert amdragon's exclude stuff.
\r
126 > I don't have strong feelings either way, except it is somewhat late in
\r
127 > the day for a large(ish) and complicated series.
\r
129 > There are several other patch series that look ready from a review point
\r
130 > of view, but I'd rather have them pushed earlier in the release cycle
\r
131 > (or at least I don't see a hurry). For example
\r
133 > id:"1329490088-8323-2-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com"
\r
134 > id:"1329697590-7404-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu"
\r
136 > My (tentative) plan is to push those once I have branched for release.
\r
137 > _______________________________________________
\r
138 > notmuch mailing list
\r
139 > notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
140 > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
\r