1 Return-Path: <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00527431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:00:31 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id xFr5WKm751OU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:00:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from defaultvalue.org (defaultvalue.org [70.85.129.156])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712AC431FB5
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:00:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
21 by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFDA90D35;
\r
22 Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:00:31 -0600 (CST)
\r
23 Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7])
\r
24 by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F317B50249;
\r
25 Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:00:26 -0600 (CST)
\r
26 Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
27 id E1B827BA55A; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:00:26 -0600 (CST)
\r
28 From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
\r
29 To: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
30 Subject: Re: Spam and mailing list filtering?
\r
31 References: <87ei7ggjx4.fsf@lsip.4a.telent.net> <87vd0sui8l.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
32 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:00:26 -0600
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <87vd0sui8l.fsf@gmail.com> (Ben Gamari's message of "Thu, 10 Feb
\r
34 2011 08:33:30 -0500")
\r
35 Message-ID: <87ei7fnalh.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
\r
36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
\r
38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
39 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
41 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
43 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
44 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
45 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
46 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
47 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
48 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
50 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
52 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:00:31 -0000
\r
54 Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com> writes:
\r
56 > I simply run new mail through bogofilter in my sorting script and tag
\r
57 > junk with a junk tag. I then add "not tag:junk" to each of my saved searches.
\r
59 >> 2) Is there any way (actual or planned) to filter on X-List-Id or
\r
60 >> similar so that I can filter mailing list stuff more accurately
\r
62 Also note that if you're already filtering via procmail or similar, I
\r
63 believe you should be able to use notmuch-deliver to add tags based on
\r
64 the headers it finds.
\r
66 Alternately, if you already deliver all spam to a particular folder, the
\r
67 new "folder:" support might help.
\r
71 rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
\r
72 GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
\r