1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F8B429E25
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:36:15 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id QDhT+xJ63KLr for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:36:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 684E3431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:36:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q0CDXMTa019083;
\r
24 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:36:10 +0200
\r
25 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])
\r
26 by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs107p9-1
\r
27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
\r
28 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:36:08 +0200
\r
29 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])
\r
30 by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id
\r
31 q0CDa7u4021567; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:36:07 +0200
\r
32 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
33 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>,
\r
34 Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,
\r
35 Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg@xvx.ca>
\r
36 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] emacs: Use the new JSON reply format.
\r
37 In-Reply-To: <cunzkdtkttf.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
38 References: <1326009162-19524-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
\r
39 <1326009162-19524-5-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
\r
40 <cun62gl1cqv.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
41 <CAMoJFUt8F417wzSmiHDv2KHa9y5ARYh=xRHKEsWBXYXHfaN64A@mail.gmail.com>
\r
42 <87k44xgw09.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
43 <cunzkdtkttf.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
44 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+176~g3f9d738 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
46 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
47 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
48 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
49 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:36:07 +0200
\r
50 Message-ID: <yf6mx9tf3g8.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
\r
52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
53 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110,
\r
54 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-12_06:2012-01-12, 2012-01-12,
\r
55 1970-01-01 signatures=0
\r
56 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
\r
57 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0
\r
58 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
\r
60 scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201120094
\r
61 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
62 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
63 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
65 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
66 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
69 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
70 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
71 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
72 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
73 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
74 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:36:15 -0000
\r
76 On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:07:40 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
77 > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:33:58 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
78 > > I did not follow the rest of the discussion, so sorry if I missed
\r
79 > > something obvious. But why can't we render HTML parts in replies the
\r
80 > > same way we do in notmuch-show (using `mm-display-part')? That should
\r
81 > > not introduce a w3m.el requirement, would use the same renderer as
\r
82 > > configured for show and hence would produce consistent output in show
\r
85 > Agreed, that would be good. It could be done as a second stage, though.
\r
87 For the record. I built emacs 23.3 from source and after installation
\r
88 by default there is no w3m module available.
\r
90 Related thing: by default the value of (emacs variable)
\r
91 mm-text-html-renderer is resolved as follows (IIRC):
\r
93 if w3m module can be loaded value will be 'w3m
\r
94 if no w3m is available but w3m binary exists, value will be 'w3m-standalone
\r
95 else it gets some other value (if any).
\r