Re: A systematic way of handling Xapian lock errors?
[notmuch-archives.git] / e5 / 3ce21bec25579773b470fe20bbe9b1005da443
1 Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95F84196F3\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: 0.701\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
13         DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]\r
14         autolearn=ham\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
16         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
17         with ESMTP id KvG5V5MQgeBC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
18         Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
19 Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com (mail-qy0-f180.google.com\r
20         [209.85.221.180])\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0127C4196F2\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so4376869qyk.6\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
26         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:subject\r
27         :to:in-reply-to:references;\r
28         bh=/Sj2EdlkhFkRuPDzP/pHSO0KeHflLTYHZMzheu464ZE=;\r
29         b=JeUCoVqIFDoxXLEfTDSnHpyWrm8pnApQJRQivA65sTnO7dDL6UQozeIh+00ht8rLC9\r
30         2fwy6fkIT7MG2iGGL5UcapWT9kqXWHIt2c4jI41Caz0UY7eGPKllMHg0fjRQTqjKXE6C\r
31         es7NHCvt407AsAMhG8pIeB2hpIplCpqrpo4ds=\r
32 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
33         h=message-id:date:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:references;\r
34         b=tOL4joDhXD9tbPqvDLHgD7VWyAZ6Mp0nXgISTAAT6mxO4EFrSvp0W2np33TbDp42CF\r
35         tqRkJjlOHpdMr7COOreKHNhgIdi9twsIigQZqpelOWPtQItaz6Z5UKR7T7Ui//TzXjzW\r
36         jO6N1EczRSMOBITXzLIPZGBCBrLG28PGEnMm4=\r
37 Received: by 10.229.233.139 with SMTP id jy11mr1815327qcb.38.1269743285035;\r
38         Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
39 Received: from localhost (pool-96-236-124-222.spfdma.east.verizon.net\r
40         [96.236.124.222])\r
41         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm1610612qyk.11.2010.03.27.19.28.03\r
42         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
43         Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
44 Message-ID: <4baebeb3.9753f10a.6e95.5e56@mx.google.com>\r
45 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:03 -0700 (PDT)\r
46 From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
47 To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
48 In-Reply-To: <1268432006-24333-2-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
49 References: <1268432006-24333-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
50         <1268432006-24333-2-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>\r
51 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-config: make new message tags\r
52         configurable\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
55 Precedence: list\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
57         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
64         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 02:28:07 -0000\r
66 \r
67 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:13:26 -0500, Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com> wrote:\r
68 > Add a new_tags option in the [messages] section of the configuration\r
69 > file to allow the user to specify which tags should be added to new\r
70 > messages by notmuch new.\r
71 \r
72 Would anyone oppose this being merged? I've been running with it on a daily\r
73 basis for the last two weeks and I've had no issues. The migration path is\r
74 quite clean as the current behavior is the default.\r
75 \r
76 - Ben\r
77 \r