1 Return-Path: <jinwoo68@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC85431FCF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:05:23 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=1,
\r
14 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id cV-o2FoNhRZn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:04:44 -0800 (PST)
\r
19 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com
\r
20 [209.85.220.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB729431FCB
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:04:43 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id bj1so42563505pad.1
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:04:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
27 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
28 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
29 bh=RffYmfhbAm22slFYUVx3AgYj7y/QseJX34gAGerR4Xg=;
\r
30 b=YzrJaMDegDiTDJuMiGcI78H6hQdb0JwqF89TNBPo1Lu8jANNP38Yeok0COBD1kK2lc
\r
31 bC7pIiJpacSi0tCdqglHU8fHbYFWdlMlQkl4FvBNyYKauhmNS7zkoLUtt2pypYK7x+yz
\r
32 EluAZUArNdGCvYwGfW/ChZ+kgN829wbcHmW4ArUh4ZCJOgeHv+QwV3E5gcJhG7JmzQ7M
\r
33 OyWW1p2zD3UYelM3ajibtqSk+SZz/2NwkP0Hg4u07StLmaf/nh0AOLYKTnEx6M9WJAb6
\r
34 57TiMabyvE9aMV1o247h0Anl8v1cS+YN8kDrJR29JZTcnc2OtnZef4H42N4CA3q9O0Vy
\r
36 X-Received: by 10.70.134.97 with SMTP id pj1mr2785670pdb.125.1422558281932;
\r
37 Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:04:41 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 Received: from localhost ([2601:9:5d00:15b9:9997:a9cd:4a6a:40f0])
\r
39 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qy3sm8526722pbc.4.2015.01.29.11.04.41
\r
40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
41 Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:04:41 -0800 (PST)
\r
42 From: Jinwoo Lee <jinwoo68@gmail.com>
\r
43 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 Subject: Re: Emacs: Notmuch logo is not displayed when using ELPA package
\r
45 In-Reply-To: <878uglwh0b.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
46 References: <yq65mw51sadd.fsf@jinwoo-macbookair.roam.corp.google.com>
\r
47 <878uglwh0b.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1
\r
49 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.2.0)
\r
50 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:04:40 -0800
\r
51 Message-ID: <yq65k305s913.fsf@jinwoo-macbookair.roam.corp.google.com>
\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
58 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:05:24 -0000
\r
68 On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:58 AM, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
69 > Jinwoo Lee <jinwoo68@gmail.com> writes:
\r
71 >> TIL notmuch shows a logo at the top of the Emacs buffer!
\r
73 >> I've been using the ELPA package so far and it didn't show the logo. I
\r
74 >> switched to my local git repo to test my changes and realized that we
\r
77 >> Anyone know why the ELPA package wouldn't show it?
\r
79 > Maybe you mean MELPA? I guess there is no notmuch package in the
\r
80 > official emacs ELPA archive. Anyway, I had a quick look at the MELPA
\r
81 > recipe and they just copy *.el, rather than running the notmuch build
\r
82 > system. Somewhat unsurprisingly, a few small things break (that I know
\r
83 > of, the logo and the correct definition of version of
\r
84 > notmuch-emacs-version).
\r
86 Yes MELPA, that is. Sorry. So it's not fixable from our side?
\r