Re: A systematic way of handling Xapian lock errors?
[notmuch-archives.git] / e3 / b7c20afcdcfef5fe1163df8ebdfaffa63be5ef
1 Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC05E431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:11:47 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: 0.463\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id 7GzAfmYSZaR7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:11:46 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net\r
18         [88.164.105.66])\r
19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEC5431FB5\r
20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:11:46 -0800 (PST)\r
21 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])\r
22         by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D4220974;\r
23         Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:11:41 +0100 (CET)\r
24 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
25         :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
26         :mime-version:content-type; s=postfix; bh=GT8UV1rhBbuGvT2N/dFtFt\r
27         z3J08=; b=SCg0WejN49ff7nkB7qPYTeb/AObsonTcTjDyqVIl/xeNudMPdBy56l\r
28         0vEHaBkfEN3T0ZXviu+lqCQ5bXRJhXAF8htthve5aZDx8O2/6YbJuk/L0m8tAM87\r
29         urv6HGeXILPN0z71RVeu9ii0veqaHz2fiOrCWTepv4SiNXKedGMh0=\r
30 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=maillard.im; h=from:to\r
31         :subject:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:date:message-id\r
32         :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=postfix; b=vufejBVvPY1tGkb+\r
33         31rEDZcHH/MI7aPXKgpZ/wJxlkLrBOh4E+MZbwBzu7FS/wFxoALXdswYmnbwZYSk\r
34         hYhnhrkMNA3GKbjZpNvTEN4dD+Sx49VWX/Fu9cxU73d3y+V1/kQTMRTKK77Ss7Ad\r
35         qoAWlWQ0luJnU3M28RKD9aJl2Wg=\r
36 Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])\r
37         (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
38         (No client certificate requested)\r
39         by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;\r
40         Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:11:40 +0100 (CET)\r
41 From: Xavier Maillard <xavier@maillard.im>\r
42 To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
43 Subject: Re: Folders to tags\r
44 In-Reply-To: <87eia9gabf.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
45 References: <AANLkTikFB1qfnLvSvoAtrYaE8KJWG05J267s6XTkwFnn@mail.gmail.com>\r
46         <87eia9gabf.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
47 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
48         (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)\r
49 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:50:51 +0100\r
50 Message-ID: <m262vh1b38.fsf@kcals.maillard.im>\r
51 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
55 Precedence: list\r
56 Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
58         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:11:48 -0000\r
67 \r
68 \r
69 On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:57:08 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:\r
70 > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:48:17 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:\r
71 > > Ideally, notmuch would let me search by maildir folder, which would have the\r
72 > > added advantage of keeping things in sync going forward.  Unfortunately,\r
73 > > this looks difficult to support (possibly to the point of requiring a custom\r
74 > > query parser to do it efficiently).\r
75\r
76 > Carl was saying that this would be implemented *really* soon now, so I\r
77 > have high hopes that it will work very soon indeed.\r
78 \r
79 Does this mean I can use my good old sieve scripts to sort my mails now\r
80 ?\r
81 \r
82 /Xavier\r