1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F792431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:13:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id zoQrQS0wNgQ2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:13:45 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F01A431FB5
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:13:45 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (c-24-19-44-201.hsd1.wa.comcast.net
\r
22 (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)
\r
23 by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0R1DgG0029904
\r
24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:13:44 -0500 (EST)
\r
26 Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72)
\r
27 (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>) id 1PiGQf-0002NI-8N
\r
28 for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:13:41 -0800
\r
29 From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
30 To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
31 Subject: Re: PGP/MIME signature verification
\r
32 In-Reply-To: <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
33 References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
34 <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
35 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-96-g01f9ea1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
37 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:13:34 -0800
\r
38 Message-ID: <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
40 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
41 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
42 X-No-Spam-Score: Local
\r
43 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:13:46 -0000
\r
59 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
61 On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:22:07 -0500, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure=
\r
63 > On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:35:03 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorsema=
\r
65 > > the signature-verification branch on my git repo [0] contains functional
\r
66 > > PGP/MIME signature verification if you supply the --verify argument to
\r
68 > > notmuch show --format=3Djson
\r
70 > > It relies on gpg being in the path, and on the user having the signer's
\r
71 > > key in their gnupg keyring.
\r
73 > I was able to merge dkg's signature-verification branch on top of
\r
74 > cworth's current master head (b3caef1f) with only a tiny
\r
75 > easily-resolvable conflict. It seems to work exactly as advertised, and
\r
76 > I wholeheartedly approve and endorse this patch set for inclusion
\r
79 > Approved-and-Tested-By: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
81 Hi, all. I have rebased the "signature-verification" branch against the
\r
82 current (as of now) head of cworth's master (74cb76a6) and pushed it to
\r
85 git://finestructure.net/notmuch
\r
87 Carl: please let me know if this is suitable for pulling into your
\r
88 master branch, and definitely let me know if there's anything else I can
\r
89 do to facilitate getting these patches included.
\r
94 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
97 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
99 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNQMa/AAoJEO00zqvie6q8p9cP/jmronSyU4ciJTBTq2MXDkkx
\r
100 E/XjUmq+G68pTfC5c/ewKf7R3mjRLIChDJdwHSKuwZ4AjEI23Fc2lshhSnXihO3h
\r
101 ACjAnHrsZ8bhvW6MJBHlDlL/d5j8C6y8fTDSwNP5fCQQn57MSm8mw63B75Yl0hGF
\r
102 7rh8S5fho6+8/oagCIeVQ1ku4bkuiGgtjOtU5nF/JHXt4hqbCooHBdqTp9ie3/IA
\r
103 b+9WoFhT1bM1GGJGHHAlhgRi0nkoJhg+jNTjSVpdMr1O2Zl1bUYXVgi/y9MG5/yl
\r
104 YyTh+1587DSzbTF94584gxgeUBFKnPYQZpNLbV99XGtxHwHnaI2MvtqPXa1i0SwX
\r
105 lXq/xndGj1moZpIL9vKBapHPPeimtk23XHGEKd0KObgdfIur9PIqxyZU1Rpi71J5
\r
106 lBcZR2EE7uW94Yu8oZCUoO1/VTak8M3xNUaBqxixrLbBdBaJl8/jtDAT7jk/4HGr
\r
107 sDyOwVtcSvAYeOAGPrRIg3qxc5UyJ9VBy2a6OrRloYWKHmnUhJ4Vrc48cpzuTwuc
\r
108 /7lRKmffNzIwcOyoxtiW7gIxgcvdwNbDbev90Hv74VhgNnUHbpINLlKDU//CTuT1
\r
109 M4Iquil+eNa8lFIAlR9cJKKkEO4r12SALPsOGG6dXLmDzLKm54Mtr70z5dHhVSfx
\r
110 0L24cBmZk5sPvmsh+y+u
\r
112 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r