Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html
[notmuch-archives.git] / e2 / 200e3f11e1daad1b8e11082e1c56d64ea6210c
1 Return-Path: <polatel@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01018431FD0\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  1 Nov 2011 13:20:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id ZMMlTX3iG+hF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Tue,  1 Nov 2011 13:20:37 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com\r
19         [209.85.161.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45ECA431FB6\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  1 Nov 2011 13:20:37 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by faai28 with SMTP id i28so7781457faa.26\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:20:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
26         h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references\r
27         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to\r
28         :organization:user-agent;\r
29         bh=Q/73GMequj6f58MZbNJuk+2szG/fvOsBgLWkG88qOE8=;\r
30         b=o4IijepFIX2/KLAGU/ksL55rQ345UkaHNw4op4UAi2MmQa+6DhzHZG8nIsQ+gPPkZk\r
31         loHeYMnmvmvva+usJpEkJQ0fIiltw+X3QvoraDsfM7D58rqf+M70k8EOvpO2au1WYs24\r
32         6F/yr3gUEarrZFzQADk31h/CwIHnrJUercapk=\r
33 Received: by 10.223.88.216 with SMTP id b24mr2988438fam.30.1320178834015;\r
34         Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:20:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
35 Received: from localhost ([78.183.76.201])\r
36         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r7sm767782faa.3.2011.11.01.13.20.31\r
37         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
38         Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:20:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
39 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 22:20:25 +0200\r
40 From: Ali Polatel <polatel@gmail.com>\r
41 To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>\r
42 Subject: Re: set test prereqs (Emacs, GDB, GPG) v4\r
43 Message-ID: <20111101202025.GA8248@hayalet>\r
44 Mail-Followup-To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
45 References: <1320176954-4897-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
46 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
47 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;\r
48         protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG"\r
49 Content-Disposition: inline\r
50 In-Reply-To: <1320176954-4897-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>\r
51 Organization: Pink Floyd\r
52 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)\r
53 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
56 Precedence: list\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
58         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:20:38 -0000\r
67 \r
68 \r
69 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG\r
70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed\r
71 Content-Disposition: inline\r
72 \r
73 On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 08:49:10PM +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:\r
74 >Rebased to current master.\r
75 >\r
76 >Previous version:\r
77 >  id:"1307016220-17509-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org"\r
78 >\r
79 >Discussion:\r
80 >  id:"1317660447-27520-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net"\r
81 >\r
82 \r
83 Thanks for the nice work!\r
84 I want to share one thing which came up to my mind during reading\r
85 through them. Since we require bash for tests, we might go for using\r
86 bash's builtin 'type -P foo' instead of 'which foo'. Not that it's\r
87 important, just wondered "why not?"\r
88 \r
89                 -alip\r
90 \r
91 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG\r
92 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
93 \r
94 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
95 Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)\r
96 \r
97 iEYEARECAAYFAk6wVIkACgkQQU4yORhF8iAI1ACfYRjzfNvSl1BfPCjfXROnl66j\r
98 gvcAn1EcIS1rGoQRdaOce6aWeDBYIv8Y\r
99 =gDaz\r
100 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
101 \r
102 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--\r