1 Return-Path: <bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137D6431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:53:50 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id Qh+SYBf5ggGA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
11 Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:53:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
12 Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca (pivot.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.57])
\r
13 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76061431FAE
\r
14 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:53:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
16 fctnnbsc30w-142167182194.pppoe-dynamic.high-speed.nb.bellaliant.net
\r
17 ([142.167.182.194] helo=localhost)
\r
18 by pivot.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
\r
19 (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>)
\r
20 id 1NO9fw-0004W5-8O; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:53:48 -0400
\r
21 Received: from bremner by localhost with local (Exim 4.71)
\r
22 (envelope-from <bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca>)
\r
23 id 1NO9fq-0004Co-PQ; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:53:42 -0400
\r
24 From: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>
\r
25 To: Scott Robinson <scott@quadhome.com>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
26 In-Reply-To: <1261161923-sup-6874@lisa>
\r
27 References: <87iqcapijl.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
\r
28 <87k4wp2noq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87skbdcfu3.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
\r
29 <1261114167-sup-8228@lisa> <87k4wkyyro.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
30 <1261161923-sup-6874@lisa>
\r
31 Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:53:42 -0400
\r
32 Message-ID: <87ws0btdt5.fsf@pivot.cs.unb.ca>
\r
34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
35 X-Sender-Verified: bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca
\r
36 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] JSON output for notmuch-search and
\r
38 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
39 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
41 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
42 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
43 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
44 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
45 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
46 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
48 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
50 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:53:50 -0000
\r
52 On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:47:33 -0800, Scott Robinson <scott@quadhome.com> wrote:
\r
54 > Resubmit a full patch, or submit another one on top of it?
\r
56 My own feeling is that in general if a patch hasn't been merged into
\r
57 master, and the changes don't form a separate logical change (i.e. "oh,
\r
58 if you take that patch, you could have this feature too"), then
\r
59 resubmitting makes the most sense. This also provides a chance to rebase
\r
62 Of course, if I'm way off base here, please (notmuch list readers) let
\r