e0/3cd1c93faa675da39f66fa32b8a92b2ee44233

   1 Return-Path: <servilio@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C54740D143\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:54:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -1.999\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
  13         DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]\r
  14         autolearn=ham\r
  15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  16         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  17         with ESMTP id HW0Mcz6wPStm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  18         Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:53:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
  19 Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com\r
  20         [209.85.160.181])\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB91440D140\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:53:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so635786gyg.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:53:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to\r
  27         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
  28         bh=QWhX0G5HtvlXLHQRYvFlufALuoQQN41LxaMiGBoUbPU=;\r
  29         b=iCGnk/GvbpbN9l/ZGe9cM3QY1hUvSu0A9JxjnvjZTva+l/YH07MuucGm/tVN9bC977\r
  30         /4UTz+m/ceUFy5GKKHTC7cyFqHSvdUei6Nqa9vY8wSRZbMw1SgXuoMHDn1yxde0oW+Ep\r
  31         ryIeasbA0jYr0z/ft+PoVvM2YdaKFCf90FqJI=\r
  32 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  33         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
  34         :cc:content-type;\r
  35         b=JD65VhrkbSHcXusTOLG+vPdDi3atWnJZCVCwIPnoI2xwfKsPrZne0MUUHMhFY8VQgq\r
  36         Pze/gk1bdup9GgOascdGl9iMquNvdWUI5Fq2OJdm+qBWuKlfTYY62awAFpbHOY42i091\r
  37         Wj9UtZkUP2ZksO4Mw7EyNbzNSN33qGa/Urg5c=\r
  38 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  39 Received: by 10.42.243.70 with SMTP id ll6mr2394347icb.218.1286823237983; Mon,\r
  40         11 Oct 2010 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
  41 Received: by 10.42.165.10 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
  42 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimes1ndLhOxJupDh72h1MRR0q28wu7mjAeCOzVu@mail.gmail.com>\r
  43 References: <AANLkTimes1ndLhOxJupDh72h1MRR0q28wu7mjAeCOzVu@mail.gmail.com>\r
  44 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:53:57 -0400\r
  45 Message-ID: <AANLkTin_9YZhciynLTuj50_iGZ-V_ZNocyEWgutNMBO3@mail.gmail.com>\r
  46 Subject: Re: notmuch-next branch\r
  47 From: Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com>\r
  48 To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
  49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
  50 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  53 Precedence: list\r
  54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  63 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:54:09 -0000\r
  64 \r
  65 On 11 October 2010 14:45, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:\r
  66 > Hi,\r
  67 >\r
  68 > I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So\r
  69 > I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or\r
  70 > gitorious (please vote).\r
  71 \r
  72 +1 for gitorious, you can use OpenID and their code is available (for\r
  73 me a sign of more faith in free software than the Github people).\r
  74 \r
  75 An alternative would be to have a list of git branches in the wiki,\r
  76 with description, clone URL, etc.\r
  77 \r
  78 Servilio\r