[PATCH 2/3] ruby: allow build with RUNPATH
[notmuch-archives.git] / e0 / 39ea6fe973b3a8359bb616c29442ca5c7324fd
1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E551C429E25\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:59:19 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: 0\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
12         autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id ZiCWUav3UNNK for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:59:19 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7])\r
18         (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
19         (No client certificate requested)\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC503431FB6\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:59:18 -0800 (PST)\r
22 Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1])\r
23         by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q0CCxDDj031716;\r
24         Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:59:13 +0200\r
25 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
26         by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs105ws-1\r
27         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
28         Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:59:12 +0200\r
29 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
30         by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id\r
31         q0CCxBjO013776; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:59:11 +0200\r
32 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
33 To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] test: add tests for "notmuch reply"\r
35         --reply-to=sender\r
36 In-Reply-To: <20120112035032.GV20796@mit.edu>\r
37 References: <cover.1325794371.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
38         <cover.1326224339.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
39         <33b8a00a073d39baeecc86b8b8f97683d2cec3c0.1326224339.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
40         <20120112035032.GV20796@mit.edu>\r
41 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+176~g3f9d738 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
42         (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
43 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
44         $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
45         !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
46 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:59:11 +0200\r
47 Message-ID: <yf6pqepf55s.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>\r
48 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
50 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110,\r
51  1.0.211,       0.0.0000        definitions=2012-01-12_06:2012-01-12, 2012-01-12,\r
52         1970-01-01 signatures=0\r
53 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0\r
54         ipscore=0 suspectscore=0\r
55         phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0\r
56         reason=mlx\r
57         scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201120083\r
58 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
61 Precedence: list\r
62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
63         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
70         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
71 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:59:20 -0000\r
72 \r
73 On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:50:32 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:\r
74 > I'm not sure what the point of the last test is, but this patch\r
75 > covered everything I could think of, so LGTM.\r
76 \r
77 Maybe checking that long subject line (possibly split/join sometimes in the\r
78 process) keeps it's original form (?)\r
79 \r
80 LGTM (and my opinion is that 'r' in emacs is changed to 'reply-to-sender'\r
81 -- more consistent with other clients and less error prone to use (note\r
82 that I've voted this already so this doesn't increase vote count there)). \r
83 \r
84 Tomi\r