Re: notmuch.el: controlling what does and doesn't get expanded in searches
[notmuch-archives.git] / db / 9213d17d245186b4fad08d78d977676166ef56
1 Return-Path: <james@jamesvasile.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABBD431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:04:45 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: 0.373\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id h7cmPY-FsWXn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:04:44 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from hackervisions.org (67-207-143-141.slicehost.net\r
18         [67.207.143.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
19         (No client certificate requested)\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24B9431FAE\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:04:44 -0800 (PST)\r
22 Received: from 095-097-039-212.static.chello.nl ([95.97.39.212]\r
23  helo=localhost)        by hackervisions.org with esmtpsa\r
24  (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)   (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from\r
25  <james@jamesvasile.com>)       id 1S5glg-0004n7-9t     for notmuch@notmuchmail.org;\r
26  Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:04:44 -0500\r
27 From: James Vasile <james@hackervisions.org>\r
28 To: notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
29 Subject: Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?\r
30 In-Reply-To: <87k42vrqve.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>\r
31 References: <87k42vrqve.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>\r
32 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+206~gf3628de (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
33         (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
34 Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:04:36 -0500\r
35 Message-ID: <87ipif2fdn.fsf@wyzanski.jamesvasile.com>\r
36 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
37 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
38         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
39 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
40 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
41 Precedence: list\r
42 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
43         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
44 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
45         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
46 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
47 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
48 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
49 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
50         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
51 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:04:45 -0000\r
52 \r
53 --=-=-=\r
54 \r
55 On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:37:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:\r
56 > Any ideas on how to approach this?\r
57 \r
58 Treat messages with the same ID but different hashes as different?\r
59 \r
60 --=-=-=\r
61 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
62 \r
63 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
64 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
65 \r
66 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPWOakAAoJECaDklOuuidYL+gH/0pQ8aLH65Fjle01nfgqfehx\r
67 c29lvq76jbdxLIcrqR1vpp0U7PfE3zBofVI+aAL2r9oe/HcMcpyAKMJboFgyu6Ok\r
68 pqZfnbizCaPWiF1TfTvkfSjLueGx0dRqUZ5DVar0lDa1+W/n7df/yQFeMjAibdXQ\r
69 H7H+1kJHVc4uE2SWGCXKtCd6moH2xn6t/Gc7sJ/ZexSUylqLc3RXoyu/cfQ109Ag\r
70 z7RGM5PbSyA3cmzCP8lsWqekm//er/5MdhGMOmKA8QB7IGoWQzejQwPq7R2tPavV\r
71 yLVCjXWeZ3XuD7UZciDCbmxXtWguXEUe9x2mU5EUOWlcTXJzKhr0o+1AMP1+99M=\r
72 =ASCf\r
73 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
74 --=-=-=--\r