Re: Avoiding the "huge INBOX of death"
[notmuch-archives.git] / da / 6d948682763eac7c74e0850b3cb86a85de1e32
1 Return-Path: <alpine.art.de@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167FA431FBC\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:07:38 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id w+S9JS8-ARxV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:07:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-bk0-f42.google.com (mail-bk0-f42.google.com\r
19         [209.85.214.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B2F431FB6\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:07:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id jk13so2932916bkc.29\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:07:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
26         h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:message-id\r
27         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;\r
28         bh=R7tpGR9x/bemYy4rh3YXCP8I0+XNNDMiLWiOWlwdRvs=;\r
29         b=lSC87/95kqChOv1Asak87x+Q8Vf+jh6A/vtX14DfPx1R6JbVrMwE72H17Swr3SQK1Y\r
30         XPiYR2/rjfL4aQh8J2zfF5T8K3GM6rDKzXSSV3h3lTqyGtHwoStT5iCpg/5G9SnMvWyT\r
31         I+yHvU8/E/GkjA8sqpv7uofd457nN32LZQzovjal94Rq9W4+BjH9JcY+8AaVn1tU+nqJ\r
32         GBkrNwsefdbpuJ+2khZrl9h+GnlwwllU3bVouib1woVX0tlOEY1mTpH0gNghJ9VW7sqg\r
33         nyTNg5dNYmPpP15U0fXBKEeW8WOfRy2YQ4JhAxkp4ADUUzqf6u6voYXuKIGy5G3BUz8z\r
34         Cnsg==\r
35 X-Received: by 10.205.22.196 with SMTP id qx4mr4351507bkb.156.1374570448694;\r
36         Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:07:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
37 Received: from localhost (p4FD0C2D8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.208.194.216])\r
38         by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ok9sm7867159bkb.8.2013.07.23.02.07.27\r
39         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
40         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
41         Tue, 23 Jul 2013 02:07:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
42 From: Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de@gmail.com>\r
43 To: <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
44 Subject: Performance-issues with large threads\r
45 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:09:15 +0200\r
46 User-Agent: trojita/v0.3.93-100-gbbf4022-dirty; Qt/4.8.4; X11; Linux; \r
47 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
48 Message-ID: <027633b9-200d-4174-a8b5-72daff923b93@gmail.com>\r
49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed\r
50 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
53 Precedence: list\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
55         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
57         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:07:38 -0000\r
64 \r
65 Hi,=0A=0A"Large" in the context of this issue is >20 replies, I have to=\r
66  wait ~1 sec until the thread shows up. With larger conversations it ge=\r
67 t's worse (a bug report on bugs.kde.org with ~400 replies takes ~13 sec=\r
68 s. to load).=0AThis is due to the fact, that notmuch-{vim,emacs} load t=\r
69 he complete mail including the body.=0Aner does a great job here, it lo=\r
70 ads all headers but only the body of the first unread mail, resulting i=\r
71 n instant loading even of gigantic conversations. It would be terrific =\r
72 to see something like that, at least in my favored vim-client ;)=0A=0AT=\r
73 hx=0AFranz\r