1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A1640771D
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:31:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 7UszYFmxeUvB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:31:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A829B40770E
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:31:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q06LUnEK032496;
\r
24 Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:31:06 +0200
\r
25 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])
\r
26 by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs0xtxa-1
\r
27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
\r
28 Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:31:05 +0200
\r
29 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])
\r
30 by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id
\r
31 q06LV4CY004390; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:31:04 +0200
\r
32 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
33 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
\r
34 Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
35 Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
36 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: call "notmuch tag" only once when archiving a
\r
38 In-Reply-To: <87d3axamtl.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
39 References: <1325615346-8302-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>
\r
40 <m2hb09kj0m.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwftao1b.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
41 <87vcop3mx1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
42 <87d3axamtl.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
43 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+157~g442d405 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
45 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
46 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
47 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
48 Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:31:04 +0200
\r
49 Message-ID: <yf662gojz6v.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
52 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110,
\r
53 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-05_05:2012-01-05, 2012-01-05,
\r
54 1970-01-01 signatures=0
\r
55 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
\r
56 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0
\r
57 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
\r
59 scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201060257
\r
60 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
63 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
64 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
67 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
68 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
70 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
72 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:31:20 -0000
\r
74 On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:58:30 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
75 > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:38:18 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
76 > > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:32:16 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
77 > > > In the search view it does exactly this.
\r
79 > > I worry about race conditions in this case, though. I frequently
\r
80 > > archive threads after I've read everything, but I still want to know if
\r
81 > > new message to that thread come in. If I attempt to archive a thread in
\r
82 > > notmuch-search, but a new message has entered the thread without me
\r
83 > > knowing it, I'll archive the new message before I had a chance to look
\r
86 > Just to be clear: The patch in question does not alter this
\r
87 > behaviour. The race you describe is there already.
\r
89 > And at a glance, it does not look like something that would be trivial
\r
90 > to fix. The buffer does not have the information to do that.
\r
92 Hmm, I currently run 'notmuch new' from command line... I've been thinking
\r
93 changing that but now knowing this issue I think I'm not going to do that...
\r