1 Return-Path: <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806C7431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id GRqhHwBP9nxI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com
\r
20 [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF67431FAF
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so2425761vbb.26
\r
25 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
27 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
\r
29 bh=f+igHKmLBkJaGVzbX+/JokcAy7Ixy2ddI6yDlJThcLY=;
\r
30 b=knddrBa8QJ+HYV2+vnS8Th8mfDrNi4QMbw3mJ78exagDTa09iIXE9gZaPkw9SNtEha
\r
31 JraZ/h4CYdrR1sn4wbErwSd+JatmsJaTsORrKMvjC9q8g64tHzOHC/ISMjeouy8MmKnB
\r
32 4+v0tB57NhJTs7FoWKU/ES1lAIZJujGMvFQeh1N06PDSzqchCkvoavF2YOxBbRB7t5QW
\r
33 vOEHoDij0LGwmp+cDGZjOfZKjSNOBOwLpfYWBf7IDdpgx2zrtOCBUvkXHR6c6oxuSS+L
\r
34 XCDifHBSmozCO0q7B3YcbAuFOdaQGa28q8v4M6Dali0hXmTw+5fzIUgcJNRfw868JdF6
\r
37 Received: by 10.52.17.207 with SMTP id q15mr172738vdd.49.1340952184088; Thu,
\r
38 28 Jun 2012 23:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 Received: by 10.220.6.3 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 In-Reply-To: <87bok3m70p.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
41 References: <1340656899-5644-1-git-send-email-ethan@betacantrips.com>
\r
42 <87bok3m70p.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
43 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:43:04 -0400
\r
45 <CAOJ+Ob1bsbU2uj2F_7CZFY2t2Pu78whNETHTYfZVKPEaymGw8Q@mail.gmail.com>
\r
46 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs
\r
47 From: Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>
\r
48 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
49 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5040a4c97e99b04c396c281
\r
50 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:43:05 -0000
\r
65 --bcaec5040a4c97e99b04c396c281
\r
66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
\r
68 On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>wrote:
\r
71 > Just a quick question: does this update the database with
\r
72 > maildir://files URIs instead of just filenames? In other words is it
\r
73 > safe to try out on actual mailstores?
\r
76 It doesn't change any of the existing filenames or do anything like a
\r
77 database "upgrade". If you run notmuch new, it should add a URI-based
\r
78 filename to each message, but I don't think it should remove old filenames,
\r
79 so I would expect it to be fine. But I didn't expect anyone to try it on
\r
80 their actual mail database.
\r
82 (I used it on a trial system but when I reverted to master some things
\r
83 > seemed to stop working)
\r
86 Sorry for breaking it :)
\r
90 --bcaec5040a4c97e99b04c396c281
\r
91 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
\r
92 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
94 <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Mark Walters <s=
\r
95 pan dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:markwalters1009@gmail.com" target=3D"=
\r
96 _blank">markwalters1009@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote clas=
\r
97 s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pad=
\r
100 Just a quick question: does this update the database with<br>
\r
101 maildir://files URIs instead of just filenames? In other words is it<br>
\r
102 safe to try out on actual mailstores?<br></blockquote><div><br>It doesn'=
\r
103 ;t change any of the existing filenames or do anything like a database &quo=
\r
104 t;upgrade". If you run notmuch new, it should add a URI-based filename=
\r
105 to each message, but I don't think it should remove old filenames, so =
\r
106 I would expect it to be fine. But I didn't expect anyone to try it on t=
\r
107 heir actual mail database.<br>
\r
108 <br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8=
\r
109 ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
\r
111 (I used it on a trial system but when I reverted to master some things<br>
\r
112 seemed to stop working)<br></blockquote><div><br>Sorry for breaking it :)<b=
\r
113 r><br>Ethan<br><br></div></div>
\r
115 --bcaec5040a4c97e99b04c396c281--
\r