1 Return-Path: <brandon@invergo.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00010431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 03:55:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id MjedI4SYPTcW for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 10 Dec 2012 03:55:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a63.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57617431FAF
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 03:55:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a63.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by homiemail-a63.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E4C2F4076
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 03:55:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=invergo.net; h=from:to
\r
26 :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=
\r
27 invergo.net; bh=QptO8+QK16qEWZMBtpBUc55WGEc=; b=lAh0epIO7sqDiWI6
\r
28 pcq3n5Rv3b1d/9g4gX8rsxhb5PcSpILdxXuraXCqpk0sn8vtyOaPX3KybauDKC8c
\r
29 +d4KY/WzFqDo22DK6LbU3mnjsXYa0tMfS5U6hlM4iO+GOrNtvx4AGwmc4aeR2c7D
\r
30 hL282zOV6+wvhwroshkx8aVIKHA=
\r
31 Received: from localhost (nat-cmprbb-upf.upf.edu [193.145.39.133])
\r
32 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
33 (No client certificate requested)
\r
34 (Authenticated sender: brandon@invergo.net)
\r
35 by homiemail-a63.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 181EA2F4079
\r
36 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 03:55:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
37 From: Brandon Invergo <brandon@invergo.net>
\r
38 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
39 Subject: handling mail sent to a subscribed list
\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1
\r
41 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
42 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:49:17 +0100
\r
43 Message-ID: <87txruqg8y.fsf@invergo.net>
\r
45 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
46 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:54:39 -0800
\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
51 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:55:50 -0000
\r
63 This is probably a rather simplistic question but I haven't been able to
\r
64 find the proper settings to overcome it; I also wasn't able to find a
\r
65 similar question in the list archives.
\r
67 I am using the notmuch emacs client (0.14) on several different
\r
68 computers. I find that when I send an email to a mailing list to which I
\r
69 am subscribed, the copy of my message that I eventually receive from the
\r
70 list sits in the new/ subdirectory of the Maildir and never has the
\r
71 inbox tag added to it. When I use a different computer and download the
\r
72 message, it is added just fine.
\r
74 The result is that I have to frequently move mail manually from
\r
75 new/ to cur/. When I run notmuch new, it detects that a file was moved,
\r
76 so I guess the mail received is properly added to the database; it just
\r
77 never gets added to inbox and is therefore never read in the emacs
\r
78 client. I'm sure there's a simple way around this and it's not a bug,
\r
79 but I haven't figured it out. Can anyone give me a tip? I hope I've
\r
80 explained clearly enough.
\r
82 Thanks for your help,
\r