1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E281431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:34:22 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id 9zobg-CPu-bE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:34:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24626431FAF
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:34:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
24 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
25 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
26 id 1TeMz0-0007t4-Uu; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:34:07 +0000
\r
27 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)
\r
28 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)
\r
29 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
30 id 1TeMz0-0007SA-MT; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:34:06 +0000
\r
31 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
32 To: Michael Stapelberg <michael+nm@stapelberg.de>,
\r
33 David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
34 Subject: Re: [BUG] Saving attachments containing UTF-8 chars
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <x6mwxza2yd.fsf@midna.zekjur.net>
\r
36 References: <x6sj8xiexi.fsf@midna.zekjur.net> <87d2yzvlpj.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
37 <x6mwxza2yd.fsf@midna.zekjur.net>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+81~g9730584 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
40 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:34:05 +0000
\r
41 Message-ID: <87boefv3hu.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
44 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
45 X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31
\r
46 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
47 X-QM-Body-MD5: 5bae939c6ffb080137de58e8ec73a17a (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
48 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.7
\r
49 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -
\r
50 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
52 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
53 This message scored -1.7 points.
\r
54 Summary of the scoring:
\r
55 * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
\r
57 * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]
\r
58 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
59 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
60 * 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
61 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
62 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
63 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
65 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
66 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
69 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
70 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
71 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
72 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
73 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
74 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:34:22 -0000
\r
79 Michael Stapelberg <michael+nm@stapelberg.de> writes:
\r
80 > David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
\r
81 >> In principle this should be fixed in current git master.
\r
82 > I just tested this and you are right, it does work in current git.
\r
84 > However, since replying to mail doesn=E2=80=99t work, I can=E2=80=99t upg=
\r
86 > suppose that will be fixed (tests fail, too) at some point in time.
\r
88 I don't think that we expect any tests to fail: they all pass for
\r
89 me. Can you say more about what is failing?
\r