1 Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38BA4196F3
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id rGM73va4UU5y for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF764196F2
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])
\r
21 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B7619F3431;
\r
22 Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:41:53 +0100 (CET)
\r
23 X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS
\r
24 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])
\r
25 by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,
\r
27 with ESMTP id Iolh6ciRFT8G; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:41:51 +0100 (CET)
\r
28 Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])
\r
29 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1253D19F33ED;
\r
30 Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:41:50 +0100 (CET)
\r
31 Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (r5da224.net.upc.cz [86.49.116.224])
\r
32 (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)
\r
33 by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBDA415C062;
\r
34 Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:41:45 +0100 (CET)
\r
35 Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.71)
\r
36 (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)
\r
37 id 1NvHHk-0006f6-R1; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:41:44 +0100
\r
38 From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
39 To: Ruben Pollan <meskio@sindominio.net>
\r
40 In-Reply-To: <20100323143714.GE28596@blackspot>
\r
41 References: <1268926780-20045-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
42 <1268926780-20045-4-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
43 <20100323105644.GB28596@blackspot> <878w9jcga6.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
44 <20100323143714.GE28596@blackspot>
\r
45 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:41:44 +0100
\r
46 Message-ID: <87tys292w7.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
49 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 3/4] Add maildir-based mailstore
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:41:55 -0000
\r
65 On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Ruben Pollan wrote:
\r
66 > On 14:35, Tue 23 Mar 10, Michal Sojka wrote:
\r
67 > > Yes, that's a bug. Messages in your mail_folder/new probably don't have
\r
68 > > any 'info' (flags) in their filename, which is correct with respect to
\r
69 > > http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html. My patch incorrectly ignores the
\r
70 > > files without 'info'. I didn't catch this error because is seems that
\r
71 > > offlineimap puts 'info' part even to messages in new/.
\r
73 > True, I use fetchmail for download my email, it put the email in the new folder
\r
76 > > I think that the correct fix for this is to change how notmuch new
\r
77 > > works: Whenever a message in new/ is found, it will be moved to cur/ and
\r
78 > > in there is no info part it will be appended and the message will be
\r
79 > > tagged accordingly.
\r
81 > I think is better if new keeps the email where it is, only updates the database,
\r
82 > and when you remove the unread tag move the message from folder to folder. Some
\r
83 > mail readers (at least mutt) handles different the emails on the new folder than
\r
84 > the ones with no "S" flag con cur folder.
\r
86 > > I'll try to implement it and send a new patch.
\r
88 > That will be nice.
\r
92 Here is the updated patch series implementing your proposal. Let me know
\r
93 if it solves your problem.
\r
95 I also did some minor cleanups and included "Prevent data loss caused by
\r
96 SIGINT during notmuch new" patch which I've just sent separately.
\r