cb/f853e68cbd4b3ed4bb6741c9344ddf83f7b8c0

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132BD431FD4\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:16 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id 8oKKebmOlAYn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
  18         [131.215.239.19])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B84431FB6\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)\r
  21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  22         by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DEA66E018B;\r
  23         Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:15 -0800 (PST)\r
  24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
  25 Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
  26         [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
  27         by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824DF66E009C;\r
  28         Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:11 -0800 (PST)\r
  29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  30         id 2F02F2C8; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:11 -0800 (PST)\r
  31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  32 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>,\r
  33         notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  34 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] search: Support automatic tag exclusions\r
  35 In-Reply-To: <cunfwfg57uh.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
  36 References: <1326258173-21163-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
  37         <1326496024-14403-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
  38         <1326496024-14403-4-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
  39         <87wr8tsvit.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  40         <cunfwfg57uh.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
  41 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+63~g6965a07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
  42         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  43 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:10 -0800\r
  44 Message-ID: <87obu35tn1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  45 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  46 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  47         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  50 Precedence: list\r
  51 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  52         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  53 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  54         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  55 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  56 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  57 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  58 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  60 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:34:16 -0000\r
  61 \r
  62 --=-=-=\r
  63 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  64 \r
  65 On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:12:38 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
  66 > I don't think that anything should be excluded from the search results\r
  67 > by default, at least not as a default behaviour of the 'notmuch'\r
  68 > binary.\r
  69 >=20\r
  70 > Having "deleted" and "spam" as default settings in the configuration\r
  71 > file might be more reasonable.\r
  72 \r
  73 Yes, I agree completely.  The CLI does not, and should not, exclude\r
  74 anything by default.  I only meant that the patch adds the configuration\r
  75 variable by default, which seems ok to me.\r
  76 \r
  77 jamie.\r
  78 \r
  79 --=-=-=\r
  80 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  81 \r
  82 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  83 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  84 \r
  85 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPFHuyAAoJEO00zqvie6q8QOMQAKJVagemDmfvsrp7PfSvsbBc\r
  86 t+1xjkmAR650/n8cHhk/Q7lpFjDtWMSZbpbB3NUsiCKQ0ZJ789bEfAloYHuDE4Fd\r
  87 u16ERHsdeldBG8KvVYL0cBdRUovHGAWkE48qwEWtZiVK6EN4aNXOK4LoFNc6DoeH\r
  88 tpzqDsZW5g6hJHVH4yyM1gCdFE2SgBqyBIYpUPHPLC0ujCa1clS7j9NUMDc99Pee\r
  89 USgGLU/k5S8rvARs0+XMXYl/Tc+8M90Y+klhS2uyIyJLQ0bpRMGqlQKJcXvrDh5b\r
  90 SdKpuUAfbLpeBp1p8gM9SFFBE6zXzaHJLQB0lX3xqQUTkMhyQtMq8lNBocMfQsUv\r
  91 mF7smtG2M7xFHDq2hZITlzEByF/YMrDfYLw7Zm3nygOxjxq6AKRCskgnRbIV0weY\r
  92 mY3RN3qYdJy9dY2hU6FsEE5iC3owrqvDTlG5V46uMc+8eKNly45u4qjSfNl2ryTb\r
  93 yZ0aqlLm6Ky4TjJXDp4sVKqUNsMKe2/8fu2hSOYTBWKTQMXmBSjowQl+sw/lFrGR\r
  94 HjY65df0WJVZs9CZj9/ZVHPVVGeup/5ofCZaFrbhF7ntrhw6sIgANn2RuOnTf/m4\r
  95 nU7wk+qM00Z3aHcwL1UCp7Iqi11frqJVQ4NyLU3ppVI9waB5pd11ISVg0vhoreTL\r
  96 t+Smh6cFuYbaExSbZMvC\r
  97 =JwTe\r
  98 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  99 --=-=-=--\r