1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B7240D154
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id WM13EttyuukH for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AB240D158
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 02:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so3006976wyb.26
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by 10.216.181.193 with SMTP id l43mr890320wem.78.1288947936689;
\r
24 Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x28sm634863weq.16.2010.11.05.02.05.34
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
\r
29 Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
\r
30 Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
31 id 4972A59405B; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:05:05 +0000 (GMT)
\r
32 To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,
\r
33 Notmuch developer list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
34 Subject: Re: Emacs UI improvement suggestion
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <87pqukxlgo.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
36 References: <87pqukxlgo.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
37 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
38 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
39 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
40 Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:05:05 +0000
\r
41 Message-ID: <87sjzg16pq.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:05:48 -0000
\r
58 On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:45:27 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:
\r
59 > One UI improvement I would love is to see the number of unread
\r
60 > emails in a thread in notmuch-show view. I often reply to a
\r
61 > mail in a thread just to see that there are followup mails that
\r
62 > resolve the issue already.
\r
64 > If I had seen that there are more unread mails in that thread
\r
65 > (or at least that branch of the thread), I would read those first
\r
66 > before hitting reply.
\r
68 > What do others think?
\r
70 Does `C-u M-RET' help?
\r